Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China Deploys Supersonic Trainer Aircraft for Pilot Training
Press Trust of India ^ | October 28, 2015

Posted on 10/30/2015 4:17:03 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: Garvin

No it doesn’t. Not even close.


21 posted on 10/30/2015 1:51:09 PM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Really? I was going to say it looks like a JF-17.


22 posted on 10/30/2015 1:55:24 PM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: wrench

Tail looks nothing like an F-16 and lost of planes have a nose similar to an F-4.


23 posted on 10/30/2015 1:57:08 PM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TalonDJ

The stab does to me.

Nothing we have now has an F4 shnozz


24 posted on 10/30/2015 1:58:39 PM PDT by wrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: wrench

‘We’? Who cares. US flown fighters are a tiny fraction what has been built and even what is in current service. People make ridiculous stretches on these threads to liken every foreign plane to something American. It gets down right silly.

If you really want to go there it looks like a T-38 and an F3 had a love child.


25 posted on 10/30/2015 2:16:38 PM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: TalonDJ

If you have ever had to design something, anything, you will very quickly learn it is far easier to copy and modify a known product than to start drawing lines on a blank piece of paper.

Ever met any aero design engineers? They do not design the whole plane, they design parts of the plane, sometimes very minute parts, and that is all. Then another team puts it all together, and yet another team engineers it so stuff will work and can be manufactured.

You got hinge guys, trunion guys, canopy guys, landing gear guys, fuel system guys, etc., etc. And that is just the airframe, engines and avionics are their own stories.

Yes, lots of stuff is copied and morphed into the final product.

Even in the F35, you can reach deep into the beast and find parts designed 30 years ago.


26 posted on 10/30/2015 2:25:19 PM PDT by wrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: wrench

I am an engineer in the aerospace industry. I have done work on the F-35. The only parts you are likely to find in there that are reused are pretty darn small. Not the whole nose.

The nose of the F-4 is dictated by the radar under that radome. I kinda doubt that plane has the same radar.


27 posted on 10/30/2015 3:39:25 PM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: TalonDJ
It gets down right silly.

It amuses me.

And if you really want a comparison, a single tailfin analog of the Taiwanese ADIC F-K-1C orks for me.

28 posted on 10/30/2015 7:19:38 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (It's funny 'cos it's trure - Homer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: TalonDJ

Well, it should since the JF-17 was also derived from an upgrade project for the J-7!!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Sabre_II


29 posted on 10/30/2015 8:10:32 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson