Posted on 10/29/2015 6:06:18 AM PDT by xzins
Carson was horrible last night.
Thanks, took me two times to read what you said and I “think” I get it.......stop laughing not nice to laugh at old people./wink. <P.
It is the translator: ok, fire it, it is very annoying.
I agree. Did you notice he didn’t have a clue what to do with his hands?
Either than or his hand-wringing was pure nervousness.
If he’d squeezed them any harder, blood would have come out of his fingertips.
You have the front end of that right. Clinton/Castro for sure.
The back end...is still up in the air. Maybe Cruz/Carson, maybe Trump/Cruz or even Cruz/Rubio.
We’ll see.
AND... he came out against ethanol subsidies. Goodbye Iowa.
Yes Rubio and Crispy both talk a good game. You just have to remember who they really are.
He needs a soundtrack every time he goes off. You know that earnest look, heartfelt thing he does. A little inspirational music would be a nice touch.
As Waylon Jennings once said, “Old age and treachery will always overcome youth and skill.” I remind my (now adult) kids of that every so often... ;-P
It’s the right answer, but probably bad timing. There are places where government research inititives can lead the way, but gasohol isn’t anything new. My understanding is that when the continued viability of the grain as cattle feed is factored in that it actually breaks even. Nonetheless, the government shouldn’t be involved.
Those demanding their subsidy will turn to someone guaranteeing their subsidy. I don’t know who that would be.
At first I thought that meant Huma...
“My thoughts are that Donald Trump should purchase two hours of block time on some obscure cable channel and then invite all the viable candidates to join him in a debate moderated by Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and Sarah Palin. The ratings would probably go through the roof.”
This idea has a lot of merit. It would make money, further showing the acumen of Trump. The money could be distributed to the campaigns according to how much of the show they paid for.
It may be the right answer, but he flip-flopped so loudly it calls his other positions into question. He studied it really hard and figured it out? Give me a break. He’s toast.
I was confused about the Mannatech thing. No idea what that was about, but he fumbled that question, too.
He’s a horrible candidate. All he had was sincerity. That is gone now.
“”Nobody ââ∠âeditsâ things anymoreâtââ‰â¢t””
Where does that crap come from? What causes it?
I started watching last night but the CNBC moderators and their stupid questions made me so mad, I quit watching and came to FR.
I am now watching my aging children morph into ME......lol
And I love reminding them of it...that's the funniest part and one they don't like to admit, rofl.
I noticed these ODD CHARACTERS are showing up all over the place (on FR).
Seems to have happened right after the recent spate of “THIS IS A MALWARE SITE” warnings (although I got none on my computer).
Wonder if they are connected ?
I notice they are in place of an ‘apostrophe’.
Yesterday, it was a SQUARE character, today it is a mix of weird characters.
The candidates did very well amongst themselves and in general against the biased panel. I was proud.
Contrast the debate last night with the Democrat debate of a few weeks ago. It is clear to me which party are the winners and which party are the losers.
I almost pity Hillary. Not!
They are in front and back of an âapostropheâ, when we use them in this example.
Also, quotation marks and sometimes after a colon.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.