(biggest question)".....ARE YOU LYING AGAIN?"
The Clinton Foundation looked at the Saudi Arabia, Oman, and Qatar donors as low hanging sources of funds, the same folk supporting Al Qaeda, ISIS, Muslim Brotherhood etc.
It was widely reported in Egyptian media that one of the leaders in the attack against the Benghazi consulate was Mohsen Al-Azazi, reported to be the actual assassin of Ambassador Christopher Stevens. Al-Azazi was closely associated with the Muslim Brotherhood and has meanwhile gone missing. None of this was discussed.
http://davidstockmanscontracorner.com/clinton-foundation-took-millions-from-countries-that-also-fund-isis-your-bad-hillary/
blumenthal was in on this deal too. She’s as crooked as her husband’s penis.
The plan failed when two SEALs showed up AGAINST ORDERS and the assault on the compound turned into a full scale battle. Locals also got involved and set fires which trapped Stevens. The plan went awry.
A rather not even think of the proceedings now. It’s too late to affect public perception that ‘she has emerged victorious’. I don’t know why Gowdy is visiting the Sunday shows. He certainly has no victory lap to enjoy. I don’t know who is at fault for the hearings having no true surprises or lethal incriminations. I don’t know if it’s more than Gowdy. Was this failure to indict agreed to? If so, in exchange for what?
But circumstantial evidence quickly emerged after the attack to suggest that one of the more useful roles of the facility was to provide some degree of cover for the CIA's various operations in Benghazi.
If the Benghazi facility was being used to support a covert CIA operation in Libya, then why would the author of this article expect a Congressional committee to ask questions about this operation in a hearing that would be broadcast all over the world on C-SPAN and various other media outlets?
If there was "circumstantial evidence" that the Benghazi facility was part of a CIA operation, then the same "circumstantial evidence" would indicate that the Clinton Foundation is a money-laundering operation for foreign donors, a front organization for the CIA, or both. If the committee wasn't going to question a former U.S. Secretary of State named Hillary Clinton about that angle to the story, then surely the whole thing was nothing but theatrics.
“Operation Zero Footprint” – What We Know About The Benghazi Mission, And Subsequent Attack…
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3352624/posts?page=124#124
Several links at the post ..... worth reading .... it will give you a lot of perspective (if not “new” perspective) on “what” & “why”.
(biggest question)".....ARE YOU LYING AGAIN?"
Because the Republicans were brought in on the ARMS RUNNING just so they COULDN’T question it!
Has it ever occurred to anyone that there was no alternate government ready to step in after Qadaffi was gone?
Hillary and Obama were hot to overthrow the government of Libya and kill Qadaffi, but they didn’t have a replacement standing in the wings.
You would think that they were overthrowing the government of Libya to try to bring in a “better” government.
Did we see that?
Where was the press conference where Hillary and Obama walk out with some guy and say,
“Here is Bob. He’s who we think should be leading Libya.”
Did you ever see that?
Why did the Democrats overthrow the government of Libya and have Qadaffi killed if they didn’t have a replacement in mind?
FWIW:
EVERY embassy/consulate is a base of operations for CIA officers.
Do you really think that ‘deputy assistant undersecretary to the vice-chairman of the agriculture committee’ is really there to just consult with local farmers?
Or maybe that’s just an excuse to wander around the country.
I went to the state dept. Website right after the attack to see what type of facility was in benghazi...
There was none listed...
That was the first lie...among many...
Wonder why when evidence pops up around the Clintons so does the body count?.
Benghazi ping.
Let Republicanprofessor know if you want on or off this ping list.
One can only hope that Gowdy and others will ask these questions in the many closed hearings and testimony.
The reason THAT question wasn’t asked is that somebody in the GOP leadership set the boundaries on this inquiry before it began. I nominate Jon McCain as the possible culprit. If Obama briefed “congressional leaders” which republican do you think he approached?