Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cruz offers his choice for House speaker
Quad-City Times ^ | October 12, 2015 | Mike Bell

Posted on 10/13/2015 6:48:54 AM PDT by Isara

SIOUX CITY — While campaigning for president in Sioux City Monday, Texas Sen. Ted Cruz weighed in on the turmoil surrounding the selection of the top Republican leader in the House.

“I think the next speaker should be Mark Levin,” Cruz said, naming the conservative talk radio host who worked in the Reagan’s administration and was the chief of staff for former Attorney General Edwin Meese.

Cruz, a first-term senator, was joined at a rally at Western Iowa Community College by two top Iowa Republican lawmakers, Sen. Chuck Grassley and 4th District Rep. Steve King.

Facing opposition from a group of conservative House members that includes King, House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio announced Sept. 28 he would step down and resign his seat. House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy of California, who had appeared to be an odds-on favorite to replace Boehner, dropped out of the race last week after many of the same conservatives backed a different candidate. The moves have left the House in turmoil with no clear speaker in sight.

During Monday's rally in front of about 200 people, Cruz spoke about his disappointment in President Barack Obama, calling him the world’s most powerful communist before stating the nation was in a state of crisis.

The candidate detailed items he said he would do the first day if elected to office, including doing away with all “illegal and unconstitutional executive actions set forth by the president.”

Cruz promised to launch a criminal investigation on Planned Parenthood and end the persecution of religious liberty of groups such as the Little Sisters of the Poor, a group of nuns who are in a legal battle against a federal requirement to provide contraception coverage to their employees because of provisions in the Affordable Care Act.

Cruz said Iowa’s role in the presidential election was important, as it has great influence in deciding who the next presidential nominee of the Republican Party will be.

“If we pick another established moderate, we will lose the election,” Cruz said. “That’s why it’s so important we pick a true conservative.”

Sioux City was the final stop on a full day of campaigning for Cruz, who also visited Fort Dodge, Rockwell City and Sac City on Monday.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cruz; housespeaker; iowa; marklevin; tcruz; tedcruz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: Isara
IMHO, we are playing with fire here. What we are watching is the birth of a 3rd party. In the past, the unhappy folks were able to change the GOP, like the Silent Majority, or the Christian vote, the gun people, the national defense people, ect, all gathered together to stop the libertarians from ruining the country. The "Rockefeller Repubs" just want a tax cut with a trade treaty and to hell with everything else. The social issue types have nowhere to go, the gun people have nowhere to go, ect.

Now, I think, The tea party types have bolstered the party, but even have trouble getting committee assignments. If the tea party types form a 3rd party, they may take the social conservatives, gun people, and fiscal conservatives with them, but as long as we split in two, we will always be smaller than the dems. It would be better if the Tea Party took over the GOP, but as you can see, there is about 20-30% that might fit in the Tea Party type vote. The libertarian vote wants to jettison the social conservatives to smoke dope and take God off the money. The establishment wants to get their tax cut and spend more money.

If we don't have a core platform that has something for everybody, we may see people split off or stay home. We are in trouble if half the party thinks following the Constitution make you a "wacko bird".

21 posted on 10/13/2015 7:38:05 AM PDT by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong
Matter of fact with numerous Republicans running there is a real possibility that a Democrat may become the successor to John Bonehead Boehner.

Yeah, about as likely as the ceiling falling in while they're taking the vote.

22 posted on 10/13/2015 7:39:05 AM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
All it takes is a majority of those voting. If Democrats vote in lockstep, as they always do, it is more of a possibility than you may realize. All they need is 1 more vote than the majority vote getter on the Republican side.

So no, not as likely as the ceiling falling in while they are taking the vote.

23 posted on 10/13/2015 7:47:28 AM PDT by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: chuckles

The National party and each state have what is called a platform. That platform is the voice of the members of the party, and pretty much the voice of we the people. Had candidates and members been loyal to that platform and the principles contained therein, would we be having this discussion?


24 posted on 10/13/2015 7:50:21 AM PDT by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Isara

Levin would never do it, but Cruz scores major points for saying it.

If Ted really wanted to make heads explode, he’d suggest Levin for Attorney General or SCOTUS Justice. And Mark just might be tempted by those....


25 posted on 10/13/2015 7:50:50 AM PDT by NewJerseyJoe (Rat mantra: "Facts are meaningless! You can use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong

Majority of all votes cast, not “1 more vote than the majority vote getter on the Republican side”. The two are not the same. Yours is a false premise, better to put your money on the ceiling.


26 posted on 10/13/2015 8:07:06 AM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
Well not really, my example was only 1 Republican receiving votes, and 1 Democrat receiving votes. If more than 1 Republican received votes then the 1 Democrat receiving votes would have to get 1 more vote than the sum of the Republican votes cast. In an earlier post I said it was the absolute majority of all votes cast.

It would not surprise me in the least though, for the GOPe to instruct the Party loyalists to make that happen. By abstaining or voting present, if it looked like someone they don't like is going to win.

So again I stand by my statement, that there is a real possibility that a Democrat could become the successor Speaker, even though I hope that isn't the case. But we know that the GOPe has no problem defeating a real conservative, regardless of the cost. We have seen that happen numerous times.

27 posted on 10/13/2015 8:47:16 AM PDT by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong

The current House:
Republicans 247
Democrats 188
Total 435

What you are saying is all 188 Democrats voted lockstep but at least 72 Republicans did not vote at all. That’s ridiculous.

Virtually No Republican would vote for a Democrat or just not bother to vote. Their constituents would be livid. No Republican would risk losing their phony baloney cockamamie job without a damn good reason.

188 lockstep Democrats will never be a majority of all votes cast, period. To entertain such a notion is just silly.


28 posted on 10/13/2015 9:20:18 AM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Isara
“I think the next speaker should be Mark Levin,”

ROFL!!!

That would be perfect. Heads would explode.

29 posted on 10/13/2015 9:21:19 AM PDT by NorthMountain ("The time has come", the Walrus said, "to talk of many things")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
You mean about as silly as not supporting Republicans that were selected by their constituents as their candidates, thus allowing the Democrat to win that seat?

Or perhaps you mean as silly as playing dirty tricks against the Republican contender that the constituents desire as their candidate in favor of the party loyalist that the constituents don't want? Thus alienating those constituents for future races.

Also, you better check your math, as the number is 60 not 72.

I no longer put anything out of the realm of possibility of the GOPe. There might even be 60 that know a majority of their constituents would support their move as well. Either that or they know they have a lock with the machinery in place for 60 of their party loyalists.

Perhaps I am too cynical of the GOPe, but they made me that way. No fault but their own. One thing I know for sure, their plan to have Boehner step down and a party loyalist assume the Speaker position has backfired on them and they are now scrambling as to how to proceed. My guess is that Boehner will rescind his stepping down and retirement at this time.

30 posted on 10/13/2015 9:58:47 AM PDT by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Isara

MARSHA BLACKBURN for SPEAKER!!


31 posted on 10/13/2015 10:12:29 AM PDT by Ann Archy (ABORTION....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chuckles

If say the Constitutional Party was formed, wouldn’t the conservative voice be louder. As it is, the Republican E filters and squashes every thought and utterance a conservative has.

Then, to get something passed the “E’s” would have to come knock on the “C’s” door????


32 posted on 10/13/2015 11:43:23 AM PDT by Cen-Tejas (it's the debt bomb stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong
You are right, it is 60, I stand corrected. It changes nothing. Your assumptions lack a foundation of factual voting history. They are just as silly as using local elections in an attempt to misdirect from the way the House operates. That dog don't hunt.

Recent election results

To be elected as Speaker, a candidate must receive an absolute majority of all votes cast for individuals, excluding those who abstain.

January 2007[edit]

Source: Election of the Speaker Office of the Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives. January 4, 2007.

Candidate Votes  %
Nancy Pelosi (D) 233 53.6%
John Boehner (R) 202 46.4%
Total 435 100.0%

January 2009[edit]

Source: Election of the Speaker Office of the Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives. January 6, 2009.

Candidate Votes  %
Nancy Pelosi (D) 255 59.4%
John Boehner (R) 174 40.6%
Total 429 100.0%
Not voting 5 0.9%
Vacant 1

January 2011[edit]

Source: Election of the Speaker Office of the Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives. January 5, 2011.

Candidate Votes  %
John Boehner (R) 242 55.6%
Nancy Pelosi (D) 173 40.0%
Heath Shuler (D) 11 2.5%
John Lewis (D) 2 0.5%
Dennis Cardoza (D) 1 0.2%
Jim Costa (D) 1 0.2%
Jim Cooper (D) 1 0.2%
Steny Hoyer (D) 1 0.2%
Marcy Kaptur (D) 1 0.2%
Total 433 100.0%
"Present" 1 0.2%
Not voting 1 0.2%

January 2013[edit]

Source: Election of the Speaker Office of the Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives. January 3, 2013.

Candidate Votes  %
John Boehner (R) 220 50.8%
Nancy Pelosi (D) 192 44.3%
Eric Cantor (R) 3 0.7%
Jim Cooper (D) 2 0.5%
Allen West (R)[a] 2 0.5%
Justin Amash (R) 1 0.2%
John Dingell (D) 1 0.2%
Jim Jordan (R) 1 0.2%
Raul Labrador (R) 1 0.2%
John Lewis (D) 1 0.2%
Colin Powell (R)[a] 1 0.2%
David Walker[a] 1 0.2%
Total 426 100.0%
"Present" 1 0.2%
Not voting 6 1.4%
Vacant 2 0.5%

January 2015[edit]

Source: Election of the Speaker Office of the Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives. January 6, 2015.

Candidate Votes  %
John Boehner (R) 216 52.9%
Nancy Pelosi (D) 164 40.2%
Dan Webster (R) 12 2.9%
Louie Gohmert (R) 3 <1.0%
Ted Yoho (R) 2 0.7%
Jim Jordan (R) 2 0.5%
Jeff Duncan (R) 1 0.2%
Rand Paul (R)[a] 1 0.2%
Colin Powell (R)[a] 1 0.2%
Trey Gowdy (R) 1 <1.0%
Kevin McCarthy (R) 1 0.2%
Jim Cooper (D) 1 0.2%
Peter DeFazio (D) 1 0.2%
Jeff Sessions (R)[a] 1 0.2%
John Lewis (D) 1 0.2%
Total 408 100.0%
"Present" 1 0.2%
Not voting* 25 5.7%
Vacant 1 0.2%

*21 DEMOCRATS did not vote

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speaker_of_the_United_States_House_of_Representatives

33 posted on 10/13/2015 12:08:02 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
You win, is that what you want to hear?

But the reality is that it is a real possibility. You may be correct that the probability is so slight that the reality seems non-existent. But we are facing a time where reality has been turned on its head, and what was once completely unthinkable, now becomes a very real possibility.

The GOPe has already shown its utter disdain for conservatives, not just within the Party, but within their base. Anyone too conservative is an enemy of the GOPe. They expect us to support them rather proceed than any alternative, as many conservatives have done in the past. They think if they are just slightly right of center they can replace conservatives with the moderate and be done with us.

In other words you can no longer point at historical data and say it is impossible.

So go ahead and declare yourself the victor and let's be done with it.

34 posted on 10/13/2015 4:33:37 PM PDT by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong

Before throwing the victor word around, I’d advise waiting until after a new Speaker is actually elected.

It appears that could take place on or about October 29th. We’ll know then if there’s anything worth cheering about.


35 posted on 10/13/2015 5:20:13 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Isara

Mark is the best choice.


36 posted on 10/14/2015 5:22:23 AM PDT by bmwcyle (People who do not study history are destine to believe really ignorant statements.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson