Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Full Title: Obama Won't Back Down After Chinese Threat, Sends U.S. Warships To Contested Islands In "Matter Of Days"
1 posted on 10/12/2015 10:04:25 AM PDT by amorphous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
To: amorphous
Obama gay photo: gay japanese sailor 61.jpg
2 posted on 10/12/2015 10:07:30 AM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: amorphous

Nothing more dangerous than an armed coward who feels cornered. Putin’s emasculated him on a world stage. Now he needs to prove how tough he is.


5 posted on 10/12/2015 10:13:24 AM PDT by pgkdan (But as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: amorphous

Three or four nations other then the USA have stated vested interests in that are, both strategic and mineral (oil). This was a known problem as far back as during the Vietnam war.


7 posted on 10/12/2015 10:14:39 AM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: amorphous

Since Obama has shrunk and sabotaged our military and while China and Russia have grown theirs in size, technology and capability, I would not be surprised to see Obama put our military into a position where it gets seriously spanked...To show our weakness...


11 posted on 10/12/2015 10:18:34 AM PDT by Iscool (Izlam and radical Izlam are different the same way a wolf and a wolf in sheeps clothing are differen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: amorphous
It's the correct direction.

The US Navy has always protected the freedom of navigation for commercial shipping, and with the free flow of goods to/from some of our allies at stake, we must cruise about and though these islands.

15 posted on 10/12/2015 10:20:41 AM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18 - Be The Leaderless Resistance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: amorphous

Obucketoshiite is not messing with some third world shiite hole.

This is a real world power he is messing with and is dragging us closer and closer to a real confrontation.

If he ever figures where and how to draw a red line on the water, we are all screwed.


21 posted on 10/12/2015 10:26:40 AM PDT by eartick (Been to the line in the sand and liked it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: amorphous

For what purpose? To anniliate the rest of our fleet? Steady Navy!


22 posted on 10/12/2015 10:26:56 AM PDT by Lopeover (2016 Election is about allegiance to the United States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: amorphous

Oooooh what a tough guy.


24 posted on 10/12/2015 10:27:58 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: amorphous

25 posted on 10/12/2015 10:28:43 AM PDT by McGruff (Trump-Cruz 2016. Make America Great Again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: amorphous
“Obama Won't Back Down After Chinese Threat, . . . . “

Obama has already backed down to the Chinese when he (Obama) allowed the Chinese to build the artificial Islands and then proclaim them sovereign Chinese land! Kind of like shutting the barn door after the horses got out!

More bull$hit from the old media!

27 posted on 10/12/2015 10:32:06 AM PDT by paratrooper82 (82nd ABN DIV. 1/508th BN Alfa Team Leader 2nd civil war is coming to the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: amorphous

Did you post the entirety of the article, because the link doesn’t work?

I mean, the link doesn’t bring me to the article.


28 posted on 10/12/2015 10:33:06 AM PDT by onyx ( PLEASE HELP COMPLETE THIS FReepathon THIS MONTH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: amorphous
so Washington can protect vital shipping lanes.

You yankee need to protect our ships, so yankee can get nice China trinkets. On sale! We ship yankee poonjab doggy yumyums...Yankee and doggy be happy and proud. You go shop now yankee!

30 posted on 10/12/2015 10:38:21 AM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: amorphous
The author doesn't seem to understand why the Spratly Islands are strategically important to the region and us. The Chinese have asserted a huge economic zone far beyond territorial sea limits. In addition to oil and other economic interests, the Spratly Islands are located near key ocean straits that must be kept open. Acceptance of Chinese claims would be a disaster. The only question is whether Obama has the stones to stand his ground if the Chinese decide to push back.


31 posted on 10/12/2015 10:40:04 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: amorphous; Admin Moderator

anyone else getting a bad link ?


33 posted on 10/12/2015 10:44:31 AM PDT by kingattax (a real American would rather die on his feet than live on his knees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: amorphous

Obama is trying his best to bring Al Mahdi with as much chaos as possible


34 posted on 10/12/2015 10:45:01 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: amorphous

The US has already overflown the island alot with P-8 Poseidon’s. The chinese sound very unprofessional when warning the US. Oneeven says You Go! Go! LMAO. One of the Americans on board chuckles at what he’s hearing on the radio. The americans on the other hand sound very professional and handles it correctly. Here is one of the videos a few weeks ago.

I would have responded to the chinese, I will take a number 1 with extra soy. LMAO. Here is the vid.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OaKbZW0pqkM


36 posted on 10/12/2015 10:52:16 AM PDT by MARKUSPRIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head

Ping


41 posted on 10/12/2015 10:57:15 AM PDT by StoneWall Brigade (MARANATHA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: amorphous

he got spanked by the iranians and the russians, so now he’s going to go shake his money maker at the chinese.


42 posted on 10/12/2015 10:57:31 AM PDT by JohnBrowdie (http://forum.stink-eye.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: amorphous
It’s not immediately clear what China intends to do with the islands and further, it’s not entirely clear why anyone should necessarily care if Beijing wants to build “sand castles” in the middle of the ocean

This is rather dim. Its obvious why they are doing it, they are claiming an entire ocean right up the the Philippine beaches.

46 posted on 10/12/2015 11:12:16 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: amorphous; kabar

“further, it’s not entirely clear why anyone should necessarily care if Beijing wants to build “sand castles” in the middle of the ocean”

This is disingenuous at best and downright ignorant at worst. The Spratlys sit just off the coast of Brunei, and not coincidentally on top of a theorized very large petroleum deposit. The South China Sea serves as a major trade conduit for all those nations bordering it, as well as international cargo moving from the Pacific west to Europe. All the other nations bordering the SCS have claims to at least part of it, but lack the muscle China does.


47 posted on 10/12/2015 11:16:45 AM PDT by Little Pig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson