Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Won't Back Down After Chinese Threat, Sends U.S. Warships [Trunc]
Zero Hedge ^ | 12 Oct 2015 | Tyler Durden

Posted on 10/12/2015 10:04:25 AM PDT by amorphous

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last
To: amorphous

Obucketoshiite is not messing with some third world shiite hole.

This is a real world power he is messing with and is dragging us closer and closer to a real confrontation.

If he ever figures where and how to draw a red line on the water, we are all screwed.


21 posted on 10/12/2015 10:26:40 AM PDT by eartick (Been to the line in the sand and liked it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

For what purpose? To anniliate the rest of our fleet? Steady Navy!


22 posted on 10/12/2015 10:26:56 AM PDT by Lopeover (2016 Election is about allegiance to the United States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

Hopefully he won’t hand over these navy ships to the Chinese, like he essentially did with the military hardware to Isis.


23 posted on 10/12/2015 10:27:02 AM PDT by catbertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

Oooooh what a tough guy.


24 posted on 10/12/2015 10:27:58 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

25 posted on 10/12/2015 10:28:43 AM PDT by McGruff (Trump-Cruz 2016. Make America Great Again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
The US Navy has always protected the freedom of navigation for commercial shipping

I'm all for protecting freedom of navigation. I'm just against using OUR ships & sailors for targets in a Chinese shooting gallery.

I think a better plan would be an overwhelming show of force composed of at least several or more ships from ever nation sharing a similar interest in freedom of navigation (e.g. Japan, SK, Britain, Australia, Philippines, Malaysia, France, Canada, Mexico, ...).

26 posted on 10/12/2015 10:31:32 AM PDT by amorphous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: amorphous
“Obama Won't Back Down After Chinese Threat, . . . . “

Obama has already backed down to the Chinese when he (Obama) allowed the Chinese to build the artificial Islands and then proclaim them sovereign Chinese land! Kind of like shutting the barn door after the horses got out!

More bull$hit from the old media!

27 posted on 10/12/2015 10:32:06 AM PDT by paratrooper82 (82nd ABN DIV. 1/508th BN Alfa Team Leader 2nd civil war is coming to the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

Did you post the entirety of the article, because the link doesn’t work?

I mean, the link doesn’t bring me to the article.


28 posted on 10/12/2015 10:33:06 AM PDT by onyx ( PLEASE HELP COMPLETE THIS FReepathon THIS MONTH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vetvetdoug
Nostradamus mentioned someone named “Mabus” in one of his quatrains.
29 posted on 10/12/2015 10:33:28 AM PDT by amorphous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: amorphous
so Washington can protect vital shipping lanes.

You yankee need to protect our ships, so yankee can get nice China trinkets. On sale! We ship yankee poonjab doggy yumyums...Yankee and doggy be happy and proud. You go shop now yankee!

30 posted on 10/12/2015 10:38:21 AM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amorphous
The author doesn't seem to understand why the Spratly Islands are strategically important to the region and us. The Chinese have asserted a huge economic zone far beyond territorial sea limits. In addition to oil and other economic interests, the Spratly Islands are located near key ocean straits that must be kept open. Acceptance of Chinese claims would be a disaster. The only question is whether Obama has the stones to stand his ground if the Chinese decide to push back.


31 posted on 10/12/2015 10:40:04 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

I read on an earlier thread that no US Navy has sailed the area since 2012.....should have sailed through on a regular basis.


32 posted on 10/12/2015 10:44:30 AM PDT by spokeshave (MDSM = Mentally Discombobulated Screaming Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: amorphous; Admin Moderator

anyone else getting a bad link ?


33 posted on 10/12/2015 10:44:31 AM PDT by kingattax (a real American would rather die on his feet than live on his knees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

Obama is trying his best to bring Al Mahdi with as much chaos as possible


34 posted on 10/12/2015 10:45:01 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

You’re right.


35 posted on 10/12/2015 10:48:43 AM PDT by windcliff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

The US has already overflown the island alot with P-8 Poseidon’s. The chinese sound very unprofessional when warning the US. Oneeven says You Go! Go! LMAO. One of the Americans on board chuckles at what he’s hearing on the radio. The americans on the other hand sound very professional and handles it correctly. Here is one of the videos a few weeks ago.

I would have responded to the chinese, I will take a number 1 with extra soy. LMAO. Here is the vid.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OaKbZW0pqkM


36 posted on 10/12/2015 10:52:16 AM PDT by MARKUSPRIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: windcliff

Great. Let’s fight the Russians in Syria and while we’re at it, take on the Chinese in the Pacific.

Because, after all, our Navy and Army are at the smallest size since 1939, or earlier...

(Is there anyone with any sense in Washington...?)


37 posted on 10/12/2015 10:52:30 AM PDT by CondorFlight (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: amorphous
The Chinese will not fire on a US Capital Ship.

They know the consequences.

38 posted on 10/12/2015 10:52:51 AM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18 - Be The Leaderless Resistance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: onyx; Admin Moderator
Hmmm, It's been removed from Zero Hedge.

Moderator may wish to take action with this thread as he/she deems appropriate.

Apologies, but it was certainly certainly there at the time.

ZH, in their article, linked to an article concerning the matter at the WSJ. I see it's still up at the WSJ:

U.S. Patrols to Test China’s Pledge on South China Sea Islands ‘A matter of time’ when operations will start despite Xi Jinping’s surprise commitment in Washington

39 posted on 10/12/2015 10:52:57 AM PDT by amorphous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: MARKUSPRIME

If Americans are so GD professional how is it we’re trillions in debt to the Communist Chinese while we decline and they build up?


40 posted on 10/12/2015 10:56:29 AM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson