Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

50 to 100 a year is the number Obama is considering, but I expect the final number to be one a year.

Nobody will stop this out-of-control tyrant.

1 posted on 10/09/2015 10:03:48 AM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
To: Lazamataz

How would this play out in court?


2 posted on 10/09/2015 10:05:43 AM PDT by Fido969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

Sure we will…don’t lose hope.


3 posted on 10/09/2015 10:06:06 AM PDT by basil ( God bless the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

Hicap dealers...hi cap mags...I see a trend here. Next will be hicap ammo buyers...where will it all end??

Remember gang...liberals have NO problem w/ guns. Their problem is that you can have them too.


6 posted on 10/09/2015 10:11:03 AM PDT by 556x45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

No creeping changes for me, I hate payin for the same ground twice...

My forefathers fought for this country in all wars and conflicts since before she existed, and these Colors Never Run...


7 posted on 10/09/2015 10:11:43 AM PDT by 100American (Knowledge is knowing how, Wisdom is knowing when)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

Nobody in a position of authority wants to stop him. They all believe that they can ride the tiger, feed the tiger and it won’t eat them.


8 posted on 10/09/2015 10:13:34 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

It might be time to give the entire Obama administration all of our bullets. We’ll police the brass later. :)


9 posted on 10/09/2015 10:16:00 AM PDT by tbpiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

I know that our heroic GOP leadership will fight this. /sarc


10 posted on 10/09/2015 10:18:11 AM PDT by Pelham (A refusal to deport is defacto amnesty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

Isn’t that illegal?


11 posted on 10/09/2015 10:19:03 AM PDT by ForYourChildren (Christian Education [ RomanRoadsMedia.com - Classical Christian Approach to Homeschool ])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz
The trick is the difficulty in enforcing it. Anytime Fedgov makes a law that's impossible to enforce, it means we're responsible for proving we're in compliance.
12 posted on 10/09/2015 10:19:52 AM PDT by demshateGod (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

It’s “Super-Complicated” = you probably can’t fully understand. LOve it.


13 posted on 10/09/2015 10:21:00 AM PDT by Zarro (Find and support the Truth in Media Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

Let’s keep repeating it. There is no difference between Obama and Romney. There is no difference between Obama and Romney. There is no difference between Obama and Romney. Maybe it will come true if we click our heels.


14 posted on 10/09/2015 10:21:59 AM PDT by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz
Obama May Bypass Congress, Impose 'Order' For Gun Background Checks

Obama WILL Bypass Congress, Impose 'Order' For Gun Background Checks


16 posted on 10/09/2015 10:22:54 AM PDT by Iron Munro (The wise have stores of choice food and oil but a foolish man devours all he has. Proverbs 21:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

Obama needs to figure out a way to get Jamal to do a background check on Leroy when he sells him a stolen gun out of the trunk of his car parked behind Walmart.


18 posted on 10/09/2015 10:25:30 AM PDT by DJ Taylor (Once again our country is at war, and once again the Democrats have sided with our enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

The President of the United States is the chief executive of the executive branch (and commander in chief of the armed forces) An executive order is something he issues to departments within the administration, they are not laws.

He has no authority do do what is proposed in this article.


19 posted on 10/09/2015 10:26:08 AM PDT by CIB-173RDABN (Nothing to add at the moment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

USA Vote me twice for a foreign enemy agent who surrounds himself with anti- American islamonazis and commies —,-and the results are predictable.


20 posted on 10/09/2015 10:26:25 AM PDT by faithhopecharity (Brilliant, funny, and incisive Tagline coming to this space soon.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

and Background Checks for Presidential candidates so another Obama never happens again


21 posted on 10/09/2015 10:27:44 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

“This is a super-complicated policy,” an administration official familiar with the idea told NBC.”

Who?.............love the unnamed sources.


22 posted on 10/09/2015 10:28:55 AM PDT by V_TWIN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

What we have here is an overindulged, low IQ poseur ... a REAL self-important, anti-American, ‘drunk-on-power’ megalomaniac. Papa Doc had noth’n on THIS a%$ hat!


23 posted on 10/09/2015 10:28:59 AM PDT by SMARTY ("What is freedom? To have the will to be responsible for one's self. "M. Stirner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

Most of the more-than-occasional sellers at gun shows used to have FFLs, and would be happy to have them again, but had their licenses pulled or their renewals declined, as a part of a determined effort by BATF to reduce the number of FFLs.


24 posted on 10/09/2015 10:30:07 AM PDT by jdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

Actually, he probably can do that. The law says you have to have an FFL if you are engaged in a firearms business but doesn’t say how firearm business is defined. It is currently up to the BATFE to decide what constitutes a firearms business and they have left it undefined so that they can prosecute whoever it pleases them to prosecute. The BATFE is in the executive branch, so Obama honestly does have the authority to tell them “no a guys gotta sell 50 in a years before you can mess with him”.

Who thinks I could sell 49 guns a year without the BATFE chasing me down? I don’t. He’s pretending to set a limit where one didn’t exist, but honestly he is probably expanding the limit.


25 posted on 10/09/2015 10:30:29 AM PDT by thorvaldr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson