Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge says Hillary Clinton’s server is private
Washington Times ^ | 10/7/15 | Stephen Dinan

Posted on 10/07/2015 9:40:07 PM PDT by Nachum

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: Bryan24

Permission from whom? Didn’t she run the State Dept?


41 posted on 10/08/2015 3:23:23 AM PDT by ez (Abashed the devil stood and felt how awful goodness is... - Milton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ez

So does that mean if I shoot someone with another persons gun, I have nothing to worry about? (sarc)


42 posted on 10/08/2015 3:51:14 AM PDT by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Do these fools know what a search warrant is? Do they know that the items or things the search warrant specifically describe are LEGAL to garner by law enforcement and the courts?

Oh, I forgot........we are not addressing a low level citizen for she is one of the elite of what used to be America.

Oh, forget it!


43 posted on 10/08/2015 3:58:17 AM PDT by DH (Once the tainted finger of government touches anything the rot begins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Federal civilians who want to use their private computers to telework and access unclassified networks have to sign agreements that no classified data can be accessed and the government can seize their private computers at any time. There’s also all kind of antivirus software requirements you have to keep up.


44 posted on 10/08/2015 5:19:13 AM PDT by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Judge says Hillary Clinton’s server is private>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Yep! Private except to the Russians, Chinese, and other enemies of the United States.


45 posted on 10/08/2015 5:30:47 AM PDT by Candor7 (Obama fascism article:(http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Fix => In


Yup.
Clinton co mingled her business at the Clinton Foundation, Secretary of State plus her personal business so she has nothing that is private.

Her Sec Of State business is public, government property and anything she has in her possession at this point is stolen government property.

In fact, her stripping classified Secret documents of their security markings and having them e mailed to personal account is theft of government documents in and of itself.

Theft of Secret documents is espionage

The Clinton Foundation is a tax exempt non profit corporation which makes it's property is quasi -public and thus subject to government review and regulation and is legally subject disclosure

With respect to Clinton's server - nothing is private anymore because it is common knowledge and proven fact that she has so blatantly co mingled Sec of State, Clinton Foundation and her personal business

This Judge is out of his mind

Consider this though because this is the big take away from all of this.

Hillary could not do otherwise if she was using the Clinton Foundation and Bill Clinton , her position of power and influence as Sec of State, and her business affairs with American and foreign nationals to run massive pay for play scheme.

Pretty much every high level official in the Obama Administration has been caught using secret personal e mails to circumvent scrutiny of their misdeeds and malfeasance.

The smart ones use these accounts selectively and carefully so they don't get caught. All use the government system so they can play It's Personal and Private tin the courts to fight having to turn personal information over.

Hillary made a huge mistake by not even bothering to open up a State Dept e mail account, much less use one and this , combines with doing exactly the same thing with the Clinton Foundation e mails, will be her downfall.

This Mrs Clinton inside, Mr Clinton outside influence peddling game has been going on so long, since the Clinton were still in the White House, that it all seems natural and second nature to them.

Investigators will be able to unravel the tangled web of government, political, Clinton Foundation and private business dealings the Clintons and how the Clintons use their public position's of power as elected or appointed government officials to pursue personal power and wealth for themselves by using her e mail account as the Rosetta Stone and communications nexus for Clinton Corruption Machine

46 posted on 10/08/2015 5:45:24 AM PDT by rdcbn ("If what has happened here is not treason, it is its first cousin." Zell Miller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

The Black Robes want their payoffs to continue,
and to HELL with the US Constitution.


47 posted on 10/08/2015 6:06:33 AM PDT by Diogenesis ("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

This judge must be an affirmative-action hire...and have severe judgment issues.


48 posted on 10/08/2015 6:35:06 AM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

FLASHBACK:

http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/06/14/libby.hearing/index.html?iref=newssearch

Judge orders Libby jailed during appeal

June 14, 2007

WASHINGTON (CNN) — A federal judge on Thursday ordered I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby to report to prison while his attorneys appeal his perjury and obstruction convictions.

Libby’s attorneys asked that the order be stayed, but U.S. District Court Judge Reggie Walton denied the request and told Vice President Dick Cheney’s former chief of staff that he has 10 days to appeal the ruling.

Libby was sentenced to 2½ years in prison for lying and obstructing the investigation into who revealed Valerie Plame Wilson as a CIA operative in 2003. He also was fined $250,000.

(snip)

http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/weekly-updates/justices-black-panther-lies/

Justice’s Black Panther Lies
AUGUST 03, 2012

Court Rules DOJ Politicized Black Panther Case, Awards JW Court Fees

Judicial Watch has been confident for some time that the evidence shows that political appointees at the Holder Justice Department were involved in the decision to abandon the DOJ’s own voter intimidation lawsuit against the New Black Panther Party. And we’ve also been concerned that at least one high ranking Justice Department official lied about it under oath.

And in a major victory for Judicial Watch, a federal court seems to agree with our analysis of this continuing scandal.

The ruling came courtesy of Judge Reggie B. Walton of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia in response to Judicial Watch’s effort to obtain attorney’s fees from the Justice Department for stonewalling the release of documents pertaining to the Black Panther scandal. Here’s the key quote from Judge Walton’s ruling:

The documents reveal that political appointees within DOJ were conferring about the status and resolution of the New Black Panther Party case in the days preceding the DOJ’s dismissal of claims in that case, which would appear to contradict Assistant Attorney General Perez’s testimony that political leadership was not involved in that decision. Surely the public has an interest in documents that cast doubt on the accuracy of government officials’ representations regarding the possible politicization of agency decision-making.

(snip)

http://www.examiner.com/article/anti-gun-judge-tea-party-vs-irs-suit-shows-moderate-dangers-to-liberty

Anti-gun judge in Tea Party vs. IRS suit shows ‘moderate’ dangers to liberty

News & Politics Examiner (USA) - October 29, 2014

The federal judge who dismissed lawsuits by Tea Party groups against the Internal Revenue Service was nominated by President George W. Bush. The media is making sure everyone knows that.

Judge Reggie Walton was “a Republican-appointed federal judge,” Politico tells us. “Walton [was] a President George W. Bush-appointee.”

“Walton was nominated as a federal judge in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, by President George W. Bush in 2001,” USA Today chimed in. That background was also noted in stories appearing in “conservative” sites, creating the impression that, even if the decision may be unpopular in some circles, at least it reflects a spirit of bipartisanship, and what we can do when we put aside oue differences and work together.

What it actually reflects is the destructive effect of Stupid Party compromises, the “kinder, gentler” and “compassionate conservatism” that’s been at the squishy RINO core of the Bush family political dynasty, beginning with old man. And this isn’t the first time Walton has shown the stuff he’s made of.

The guy has proven time and again, oath to the Constitution be damned, his true allegiance is to unrestrained government. As presiding judge of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, BuzzFeed noted, Walton “dramatically expanded the ability of the federal government to use controversial techniques to gather intelligence on Americans both at home and abroad that have outraged civil libertarians.”

Walton was appointed to that position by Chief Justice John Roberts (the guy who betrayed his backers on Obamacare).

“In more than a dozen classified rulings, the nation’s surveillance court has created a secret body of law,” The New York Times reported. “[I]t has quietly become almost a parallel Supreme Court...”

Walton, naturally, is also an avowed judicial opponent of the right of the people to keep and bear arms. A Gomer link seems in order here.

“U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton last night dismissed a National Rifle Association (NRA)-backed lawsuit challenging the constitutionality on Second Amendment grounds of Washington, DC’s ban on the sale and possession of handguns,” the Violence Policy Center crowed back in 2004, before the historic Heller decision. “Judge Walton’s 68-page ruling in Seegars v. Ashcroft upholds the ban, which was adopted by the City Council in 1976.

“In his opinion, Judge Walton … wrote: ‘[T]he Court must conclude that the Second Amendment does not confer an individual right to possess firearms. Rather, the Amendment’s objective is to ensure the vitality of state militias,’” the VPC release continued.

With that as backstory, Walton providing cover for IRS should come as no surprise. Nor should what can be expected if “moderate” establishment Republicans continue to treat principled conservatives as enemies that must be crushed, all the while forging power-sharing alliances with “progressives” from places that embrace the Evil Party, and don’t require masks.

(snip)


49 posted on 10/08/2015 6:42:01 AM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Reggie? Let me guess.


50 posted on 10/08/2015 6:44:33 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Mine isn’t private but then some are more equal than others.


51 posted on 10/08/2015 7:02:22 AM PDT by bgill ( CDC site, "we still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

He doesn’t have authority over the records she created on those?

He does because she conducted State Dept. business on it. Also there is the criminal goings-on that she participated/instigated from it WITH ties to the Clinton Foundation. This bitch belongs under the prison.


52 posted on 10/09/2015 5:26:05 AM PDT by rfreedom4u (Rick Chollett for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson