Mark Levin Show,M-F,6PM-9PM,EDT,WABC AM,October 6,2015

“Conservatism is the antidote to tyranny precisely because its principles are the founding principles.” --Mark Levin in Liberty and Tyranny

IT’S HERE!
The long-awaited new book on wake up call for millenials: "Plunder And Deceit"!

border="0" height="250" src="http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a346/FuddFan/youcanmakeadifference_zps9283aedf.jpg" />

Mark explains it ALL… and boy do we NEED him!!
Levin FRinks

List:
1. Yhello, Yhello, Yhello
2. Get off the phone you _________________ ! :

3. Wiener Nation or “BACK BENCHER” Mention
4. Mark says “Thank Me" or "Thank Me very Much"
5.

Mark makes the gargle sound or “Levintizes” a caller
6. "Women's Underwear" (OVERBITE’s Theme Song)

or "I'm Against It" by Groucho
7. A FReeper Mention, FReeper Caller, or MarkLevinFan.com Mention
8.

“COCKAMAMIE!”
9. Mark mentions Lactose Intolerance or gives away Free Government Cheese
10. It's [time] Under

God!
11. Mention of the New York Slimes or Washington Compost
12. Mark calls someone a “Dumbass”
13. Mark

plays – and SINGS! – “Kumbaya”
14. Mark says “God bless us!” or “THERE, I SAID IT!” or

“Yabba Dabba Doo”
15. Mark mentions the “clintonoids with their hemmorhoids”
16. Mark plays the

“Quack Quack” or cuckoo clock sounds
17. “I WILL SUE THEIR ASSES!”
18. A RuPaul supporter or Crazy-Jim

catches mister call screener napping
19. “Barack MILHAUS Nobama”
and last but most important…
20.

MARK CALLS A “LEVIN SURGE!”

The Legacy Lives On!

Photobucket

Mark’s Lost Dog & Cat Rescue Foundation

“Conservatism is the antidote to tyranny precisely because its principles are the founding principles.” --Mark Levin in Liberty and Tyranny

Welcome to “The Levin Lounge”… Step in and have a virtual FRink.

Taking the country by storm, one radio station at a time – and kicking the BUTTS of the competition… it’s America’s Clean-Up Hitter!

Welcome all, to the most FUN LIVE THREAD on FreeRepublic.com!

You can call Mark’s show: 1-877-381-3811.

WELCOME Mark Levin!

yHello! He's Here In The Non-Descript Building and In The Hidden Bunker! Patriots, grab a comfy seat around the fireplace, warm your bones, grab a copy of The US Constitution, and select from Mark's Books which are on the shelves; help yourself and follow along for the next 3 hours, while we all educate each other and set the call-in libtards straight about their idiocy and treason. Also, help yourself to the Cheeseburger/Fries and Milk Duds 'buffet' and non-alcoholic drinks which Mark's graciously provided. And don't feed Barney any of that stuff!

Here the issue was legal immigrants and a son born in San Francisco. And the comments of the dissenting justices reveal some truths like Mr. Levin has talked about for a long while.

It is about time to adjust for the reality of the late 20th and early 21st centuries and make these the majority opinion it ain't 1898 any longer.

United States v. Wong Kim Ark

[Excerpts from] MR. CHIEF JUSTICE FULLER, with whom concurred MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissenting.

. . .

"That all persons born in the United States
- and not subject to any foreign power,
- excluding Indians not taxed,
are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States."
. . .
In other words,
- by the terms of the act,
all persons born in the United States, and not owing allegiance to any foreign power, are citizens.
. . .
it is argued that the words "and not subject to any foreign power" should be construed as
excepting from the operation of the statute only
- the children of public ministers
- and of aliens born during hostile occupation.
. . .
Was there any necessity of excepting them?
And if there were others described by the words,
why should the language be construed to exclude them?
. . .
They do not owe allegiance otherwise than to their own governments,
and their children cannot be regarded as born within any other.
. . .
If the act of 1866 had not contained the words, "and not subject to any foreign power,"
the children
- neither of public ministers
- nor of aliens in territory in hostile occupation
would have been included within its terms on any proper construction,
for their birth would not have subjected them to ties of allegiance,
- whether local and temporary
- or general and permanent.
There was no necessity as to them for the insertion of the words,
- although they were embraced by them.
But there were others in respect of whom the exception was needed,
- namely, the children of aliens,
  - whose parents owed local and temporary allegiance merely,
  - remaining subject to a foreign power by virtue of the tie of permanent allegiance,
  - which they had not severed by formal abjuration or equivalent conduct,
  - and some of whom were not permitted to do so if they would.
And it was to prevent the acquisition of citizenship by the children of such aliens
- merely by birth within the geographical limits of the United States
- that the words were inserted.

[end quote] The civil rights act of 1866 and the Fourteenth Amendment passed to make part of that act (which could be repealed) a part of the Constitution would not accept what's happening today.

These same dissenting justices elsewhere IMO cover the problem we know as Islamism explaining why Islamists should not only not have birthright but should be denied naturalization. The justices were addressing the subjects of China bound "by every conception of duty and by every principle of their religion."

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.