Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US and Russia can’t agree on definition of ‘terrorist’
Stars & Stripes ^

Posted on 10/03/2015 10:17:03 PM PDT by 100American

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: 100American
US and Russia can’t agree on definition of ‘terrorist’

Maybe US and Russia can agree on definition of how God views each of them:

All Scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching...--2 Timothy 3:16

All nations...they are counted to him [God] less than nothing... --Isaiah 40:17

21 posted on 10/04/2015 12:55:22 AM PDT by SeargentPrestonoftheYukon ("All scripture is given by inspiration of God and is profitable...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 100American

Obama can’t even say the words Islamic terrorist.No surprise that the USA can’t agree to what one is.


22 posted on 10/04/2015 2:51:02 AM PDT by Candor7 (Obama fascism article:(http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

“Et tu, Stars & Stripes? Shouldn’t the headline read, “U.S. Can’t Admit What A Terrorist Is”?”

Where’s the darned “LIKE” button?


23 posted on 10/04/2015 2:53:03 AM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather

My definition is if someone ask if you are a Christian and shoots them if they say yes.


24 posted on 10/04/2015 4:45:27 AM PDT by magua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: 100American

Russia has no “work place violence”?


25 posted on 10/04/2015 5:42:38 AM PDT by Recompennation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 100American

The Stars & Stripes, despite its patriotic name, is a left-wing journal. You should know that. This may be why it denigrates the invasion of Iraq under President Bush (with full congressional support!) as somehow ill-fated, when (in fact) it was an almost unequalled success — whose fruits were undone by Obama.

As for who is a terrorist: this is not a question which should be asked of Lavrov or any of the Russians, as they have used what we would call terrorism, with enthusiasm, forever. They do not make a distinction. Under the Soviets, they sponsored guerrilla wars everywhere they could. Almost always those were wars against civilians as well as military, and the “insurgents” were usually not uniformed, and hid behind civilian disguises. It was the Russian who got the Geneva rules to allow this, as a way of approving (after the fact) many of their own activities.

Our definition of terrorists would be fighters not part of a regular army, who do not distinguish between military and civilian in their attacks. It does not matter whether or not they have a “cause.” Thus the World Trade Center attack was a terrorist attack. ISIS is a terrorist organization. Most of the partisans in WWII were terrorists, no matter whom they were fighting. The Viet Cong were terrorists.

Now Russia is going to war to support a terror regime: Assad of Syria. It is a good cover for them to pretend that they are fighting ISIS, but they left ISIS alone for years until now.

It is silly to listen to a lawless regime like Russia talking about terrorism.


26 posted on 10/04/2015 7:13:25 AM PDT by docbnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson