Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Partisan Gunslinger

The “attack” on Ft. Sumter was the result of months of provocation. Mr. Lincoln could not let the south leave as it was the means of largess to the other nation-states.

Mr. Lincoln was beholding to the northern industrialists who benefited mightily from the southern state’s capital.

Funny!
I think these threads gain such traction as folk from the bible belt are grossly weary of being lorded over by sodomites, Goldman Sachs, and another of Illinois’ favorite sons, Barach Bathouse Behngazi Obama.

Just sayin’.


100 posted on 10/03/2015 3:27:49 PM PDT by Original Lurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]


To: Original Lurker
The “attack” on Ft. Sumter was the result of months of provocation. Mr. Lincoln could not let the south leave as it was the means of largess to the other nation-states.

What provocation? It was the south that stole property paid for by all the states.

Mr. Lincoln was beholding to the northern industrialists who benefited mightily from the southern state’s capital.

I think the northern industrialists would have done just fine with or without the south.

Funny! I think these threads gain such traction as folk from the bible belt are grossly weary of being lorded over by sodomites, Goldman Sachs, and another of Illinois’ favorite sons, Barach Bathouse Behngazi Obama. Just sayin’.

Obama is from Kenya or Hawaii. But if you want to go in that rabbit hole let's mention Lyndon Johnson, Jimmy Carter, and Bill Clinton. And rural folks up here are just as bible-toting as rural folks from the south.

205 posted on 10/04/2015 11:42:16 PM PDT by Partisan Gunslinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson