Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pope Francis’ only ‘real audience’ at U.S. embassy was with former gay student and his partner
LifeSiteNews ^ | 10/2/15 | Dustin Siggins

Posted on 10/02/2015 11:54:35 AM PDT by wagglebee

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: wagglebee
1 posted on 10/2/2015, 1:54:35 PM by wagglebee: “It's hard to know what to believe here, but I am certain that I don't trust Pope Francis.”

Agreed. I have no goal — and for that matter, no motive — to defend Pope Francis. What I do know is it is unavoidable that Pope Francis must trust his local leaders, in this case the archbishop who invited Kim Davis, to implement many things. That's the same at the upper levels of politics and business: people really **ARE** policy.

I am more inclined to trust the “Inside the Vatican” magazine on issues like this than a former student of the Pope from long ago, simply because the reporter has been covering the Vatican for a very long time, he is in a position to know what is happening behind the scenes, and (for people who are not naive about ecclesiastical politics) he has a great deal more to lose than most people in this situation if his article is wrong: http://insidethevatican.com/news/letter-38-2015-kim-and-francis

Maybe what we have is a politically naive pope who just wants to be “pastoral” and is being used by others. Maybe we have something worse. Maybe we have something better, i.e., someone who is cunningly wise and has an end-game much bigger than we know on the outside. After all, the Catholic world does not revolve around the United States and the Pope does have bigger problems than worrying what Americans think of him.

We'll know much more when we see what happens to the Archbishop who invited Kim Davis. What the Pope knew about Kim Davis and when he knew it may never be known to the outside world. What is important is what actions the Pope takes next, now that he knows of the uproar.

21 posted on 10/02/2015 12:52:18 PM PDT by darrellmaurina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
First the Pope was walking back his meeting with Kim Davis.

Now he's walking back his meeting with the homo's.

When will he announce he's sorry for even making the trip. And VERY sorry for meeting with Obama?

22 posted on 10/02/2015 1:06:13 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (With Great Freedom comes Great Responsibility)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: darrellmaurina; xzins; P-Marlowe
Maybe we have something better, i.e., someone who is cunningly wise and has an end-game much bigger than we know on the outside. After all, the Catholic world does not revolve around the United States and the Pope does have bigger problems than worrying what Americans think of him.

As much as I would LIKE to believe this, I simply cannot reconcile much of what he does with Church teaching.

The Pope is the leader of the Catholic Church and based on the sheer size of the Church he is the most significant religious leader in the world. His DUTY is to publicly uphold orthodox Christian beliefs and I am of the opinion that this will sometimes require refusing to publicly meet with certain individuals. The most loving thing we can ever do for someone is to warn them when their soul is in peril, it is cruelty to pretend that homosexuality is acceptable and the Pope knows this. I understand him wanting to see an old friend; however, this should have been done privately and away from media scrutiny.

That being said, I do realize that as Americans we have a tendency to want to apply conservative/liberal labels to everything and Christianity doesn't always fit into a given category as neatly as we want it to.

23 posted on 10/02/2015 1:17:17 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
Now he's walking back his meeting with the homo's.

I think you're reading it wrong, there's no indication that he regrets the meeting with the homosexuals.

24 posted on 10/02/2015 1:18:46 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
The Vatican has a "sense of regret" over the meeting. It was supposed to be a secret meeting, but after it was exposed, Reuters is calling this a misstep for the Pontiff.

Perhaps the regret here is that the Pope got caught fooling around with these queers.

25 posted on 10/02/2015 1:25:43 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (With Great Freedom comes Great Responsibility)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

You are my resident expert on these subjects. I am completely confused.


26 posted on 10/02/2015 1:30:38 PM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

The Pope is now saying he has a “sense of regret” about meeting with Kim Davis....that must make her feel awful...how very, very, cruel.


27 posted on 10/02/2015 1:37:14 PM PDT by roses of sharon ("Truly I tell you, today you will be with me in paradise." Luke 23:43)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon; wagglebee

Ohhh,

Doing my Rick Perry impersonation: Ooops.

You two are right. I thought the Vatican was expressing regret over meeting with the queers.

How silly of me. Now I see it was regret meeting with a true persecuted Christian.


28 posted on 10/02/2015 1:46:30 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (With Great Freedom comes Great Responsibility)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I’ve tried to understand how and why this man became our pope, but I simply can’t.


29 posted on 10/02/2015 2:08:38 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Agreed.


30 posted on 10/02/2015 2:14:04 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter

I think you got it right.


31 posted on 10/02/2015 2:25:07 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Enquiring minds want to know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: darrellmaurina
Agreed. #9.
32 posted on 10/02/2015 2:28:31 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Enquiring minds want to know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
The Pope didn't say that. "Unnamed Vatican sources" or "a senior Vatican official who declined to be named" said that.

Documentation? Here's the LINK

33 posted on 10/02/2015 2:32:49 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Enquiring minds want to know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

I really don’t know who to believe anymore.


34 posted on 10/02/2015 2:33:34 PM PDT by dragonblustar (Philippians 2:10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dragonblustar

I know exactly what you mean. It’s disgusting. I must say the “Vatican Press Office” sounds like a snakepit.


35 posted on 10/02/2015 2:35:35 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Enquiring minds want to know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

But he said conscientious objectors of SSM should be accommodated. What doesn’t he support?


36 posted on 10/02/2015 9:15:36 PM PDT by NetAddicted (Just looking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter

Wish the MSM would say your last paragraph, but I guess they don’t objectively do news anymore.


37 posted on 10/02/2015 9:19:31 PM PDT by NetAddicted (Just looking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Mercat

Why doesn’t he like Obama-nation?


38 posted on 10/02/2015 9:20:54 PM PDT by NetAddicted (Just looking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Mercat

He’s fiscally conservative and on most social issues conservative. Well educated and a former business owner.


39 posted on 10/02/2015 9:22:15 PM PDT by Mercat (You don't recommend better diet and exercise for a shark bite.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
former gay student

A former student.

Yeah, he was a former gay-student, but once he got the hang of being queer, he quit taking faggot lessons.

40 posted on 10/02/2015 9:23:55 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republican Freed the Slaves" month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson