Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wisconsin Deer Hunter Fends off Wolves with Walther PK .380
American Hunter ^ | September 30, 2015 | Jon Draper

Posted on 10/02/2015 6:34:24 AM PDT by SJackson

On Sept. 23, Matthew Nellessen of Friendship, Wisc., an avid deer hunter and former U.S. Army sergeant who served with the 961st Engineers in Afghanistan in 2006 and 2007, was scouting a potential hunting area in the Colburn Wildlife Management Area of Adams County when he locked eyes with a wolf only 30 yards away. Acting on instinct he gained from military service, Nellessen immediately pulled his sidearm, a Walther PK .380, and chambered a round.

That’s when things went from bad to worse. As he racked the slide, Nellessen noticed two more wolves approaching from the left.

“It all happened so fast,” said Nellessen. "It was maybe 3-4 seconds and the wolves were on me.”

The first wolf came in from the right, mouth open, fangs ready to rip into Nellesen's leg. A swift kick from the man’s boot landed square on the wolf's face and deflected the bite.

“That first wolf missed my leg by 8-10 inches,” he said.

The other two wolves weren’t far behind. As the next wolf leapt toward Nellessen, the man jumped back and was able to fire a single round into the animal. Nellessen was unsure of the lethality of the hit, but two wolves immediately retreated for the bush at the sound of the gunshot and the third limped away “like a gut-shot deer," said Nellessen.

Though shaken, Nellessen, realizing he had not been injured in the ordeal, made a hasty, yet calculated retreat to his truck, he said, "clearing every bush and tree along the way with my .380.” Reaching a point roughly 600 yards from the truck, Nellessen breathed a small sigh of relief, phoned his wife and informed her of the ordeal.

“I thought, if the wolves were still following me,” said Nellessen, “I ought to give her an idea of where I’m at.”

Once home, he called the Wisconsin DNR.

The following day, with biologists from the Wisconsin DNR and U.S.D.A. Wildlife Services in tow, Nellessen returned to the scene of the attack, hoping to find a dead wolf. At press time no wolf had been found, but Nellessen said the group did find lots of wolf sign, and a blood trail that ended after roughly 150 yards.

Nellessen is an avid outdoorsman.

Despite his encounter, Nellesen said, "I don’t blame the wolves.” He surmised that the perfect wind for scouting also turned out to be the perfect wind for unintentionally bumping into the wolves in what he described as "their living room.”

Nellessen attributes his ability to survive the encounter to his military experience and the small sidearm he carried with him that day.

“I’d be dead without my military experience,” he said. “A single bullet saved my life … a .380 FMJ.”

Phone calls and emails to the Wisconsin DNR confirm: "The Wisconsin DNR along with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service are currently investigating a report of a wolf interaction on or about that date. That’s all we can say since there is an ongoing investigation.”

Matthew Nellessen, who says he is now "In the market for a bigger gun,” renewed his NRA membership four days ago.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: banglist; concealedcarry; deer; gun; killers; military; wisconsin; wolf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last
To: SJackson

His first mistake was not having one in the pipe. He was just carrying an expensive paperweight.


21 posted on 10/02/2015 6:58:50 AM PDT by AlaskaErik (I served and protected my country for 31 years. Progressives spent that time trying to destroy it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Don’t go in the deep woods unarmed. Anywhere. You’re made of meat. Nice that our conservation efforts have been rewarded with increase risk to life.


22 posted on 10/02/2015 7:02:10 AM PDT by USCG SimTech (Honored to serve since '71)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sevlex

Possible, though a blood trail was found. And knowing the local DNR, they’ll be doing DNA. As to the description of the “action”, could be. Attacks on humans are pretty rare, and there’s plenty of food around now. But they happen.


23 posted on 10/02/2015 7:02:16 AM PDT by SJackson (Everybody has a plan until they get hit. Mike Tyson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: null and void

If there was a gun i would want its something with the 5.7 or as they call it the 5nSeven, basically a small rifle round in a pistol. Plus 22 rounds.


24 posted on 10/02/2015 7:03:50 AM PDT by Daniel Ramsey (Trump to win! He wins, we win, the nation wins!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: sevlex

“Color me skeptical.”

Same here.

More than likely he shot a wolf then made up the story as a CYA because it’s probably illegal to shoot wolves.


25 posted on 10/02/2015 7:06:36 AM PDT by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sevlex
Color me skeptical.

I'll second that.

Not many wolves here in DuPage County, but plenty of coyotes. If anything like the coyotes, I find it unlikely.

I see them often in on winter evenings, when out with my dogs.
Including one that ran up about TEN FEET, from my two ferocious(?) Australian Shepherds, and I.
The dogs and I did not like this, he turned and ran off.

I asked our veterinarian about this, he said not to worry, with a little dog be concerned.
He walks his dogs in the forest preserve next to his house each evening, no problems.

26 posted on 10/02/2015 7:08:01 AM PDT by DUMBGRUNT (BINGO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog
Why would you have FMJ in a gun you plan to use for self defense?

A guy I knew at a sportsmen's club owned a Walther. He had occasional jamming problems when he used hollow points. Occasional meaning perhaps 1% or 2% of the time. So maybe that's why the person in the article used FMJ rounds.

I'll note that the guy I knew was lazy in cleaning his firearms. That probably played a part as well.

27 posted on 10/02/2015 7:09:34 AM PDT by Leaning Right (Why am I holding this lantern? I am looking for the next Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
I have hunted a lot in Canada with MrD just north of there for mule deer and bears, never saw a single wolf, even tho we knew they were there.

Very scary story!

28 posted on 10/02/2015 7:10:37 AM PDT by Ditter (God Bless Texas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sockhead

Wolf attacks on people are extraordinarily rare.


29 posted on 10/02/2015 7:11:05 AM PDT by Durus (You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: umgud

At 30 yds?

Save your ammo.


30 posted on 10/02/2015 7:14:01 AM PDT by DUMBGRUNT (BINGO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right
how many federal, state, and local violations

And that is why we get this 'story'.

He took a shot, then realized he could lose everything!

31 posted on 10/02/2015 7:18:53 AM PDT by DUMBGRUNT (BINGO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AlaskaErik

“a Walther PK .380”

The Walther PPK is a .380, or 9mm Kurtz (short) while the Walther PP (`Poleitzi Pistol’) is a .32.
The PPK is a double action/single action. The first shot is a long trip, so maybe he was OK carrying with a round in the chamber in the wild. But even a `mouse gun’ will blow out your femoral artery. Having said that,

Dear Glock & similar DA pistoleros/tough guys (I own a Gl 19), fair warning: If you `accidentally’ shoot me or someone I love, say in line at a pharmacy because you had to have one `up the pipe’—accidental discharge, whatever—you’d better kill me.


32 posted on 10/02/2015 7:19:35 AM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
"I usually carry a 357 though an incident like this, three attacking simultaneously, I magazine capacity could be an issue."

I dunno about that. He only needed one round. I bet the very loud report of a .357 would scare most of a "pack" away. And if 6 rounds of .357 can't do the job against any given bear then you were probably dead from the word go regardless of what you were carrying.

33 posted on 10/02/2015 7:20:05 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: IMR 4350

Why would he call the DNR to report it?


34 posted on 10/02/2015 7:21:34 AM PDT by culper jr (We need to stop our modern day Benedict Arnold.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

A .380 FMJ will do its job if you do yours. I have a couple .380s, and am getting another one, because I do like the caliber. It’s a suitable round for up-close and personal work. I’ll be 65 on my next birthday, so I’m not as strong as I used to be. Thus, now I pretty much limit my handguns to calibers that begin with a 3 (which includes the metric variety, such as 9mm, which, caliber-wise, is the same as a .380, but with more “oomph”).


35 posted on 10/02/2015 7:24:49 AM PDT by ought-six (Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DUMBGRUNT

I had a roommate who used to live in the Santa Cruz mountains.

One evening he was sitting on his porch quietly admiring the view when a coyote hopped up on the porch, sat down next to his chair and used this slightly higher perch to look out over the same view.

Then the coyote looked up and realized he was there!

It got this horrified ‘OH CRAP!’ look.

He said he never saw one move so fast...


36 posted on 10/02/2015 7:24:51 AM PDT by null and void (The voter pool needs chlorine, or maybe formaldihyde...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

The .380 round is the same as a 9mm but lower powered. Some might say it’s underpowered. On the other hand it’s easier to aim and shoot multiple rounds. It’s a balance between power and control.


37 posted on 10/02/2015 7:30:02 AM PDT by captain_dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

Judge with Winchester PDX, backed up with Bond derringer with Winchester PDX.


38 posted on 10/02/2015 7:30:14 AM PDT by Mogger (Independence, better fuel economy and performance with American made synthetic oil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right
"He had occasional jamming problems when he used hollow points. Occasional meaning perhaps 1% or 2% of the time."

I would never, ever, trust my life to a firearm with that kind of failure rate. I wouldn't carry any gun that I hadn't already fired at least 500 rounds through without a hiccup.

39 posted on 10/02/2015 7:30:18 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: culper jr

Shot it but didn’t kill it.

Someone report a shot wolf and it might come back to him, so create a CYA story.


40 posted on 10/02/2015 7:30:24 AM PDT by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson