Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pope Francis' meeting with Kim Davis not a form of support, Vatican says
Fox News ^

Posted on 10/02/2015 3:38:00 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last
So the Pope OPPOSES Kim Davis? Is that why he met with her?

I suppose we can say that the Pope meeting with B Hussein Obama need not indicate support for Obama, then, right?

1 posted on 10/02/2015 3:38:01 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
Another part of the article:

News of the audience sent shockwaves through the U.S. church, with Davis' supporters saying it showed the pope backed her cause and opponents questioning whether the pope had been duped into meeting with her and truly knew the details of her case.

So this genius of a Pope, according to the left, got DUPED.

But B Hussein Obama hasn't been DUPED, eh, media?

2 posted on 10/02/2015 3:41:09 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

This statement wouldn’t have been issued without the Pope’s approval. So in order to placate the gay mafia, he’s backing down on one of the two good things he did here.


3 posted on 10/02/2015 3:41:31 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
Pope Francis' meeting with Kim Davis not a form of support, Vatican says.

Then what was it?

4 posted on 10/02/2015 3:42:23 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
should not be considered a form of support
So the Pope OPPOSES [?]

I think I've discovered your problem.

5 posted on 10/02/2015 3:45:58 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

“Pope Francis’ meeting with Kim Davis not a form of support, Vatican says”

Yeah, Im sure Kim approved, initiated, arranged the meeting with Dear Pope. What a fricking coward this Pope is, amongst other things.


6 posted on 10/02/2015 3:48:27 AM PDT by DAC21 (.z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
Perhaps the nuance filter on my Vatican Statement Disgronificator is malfunctioning again, but this sounds like Kim Davis just got thrown under at least one wheel of the Popemobile.

Mr. niteowl77

7 posted on 10/02/2015 4:00:08 AM PDT by niteowl77 ("I wish I had better news for you, but the truth is that this thing is not worth fixing anymore.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

The pope is a jackass!


8 posted on 10/02/2015 4:02:02 AM PDT by King Moonracer (Bad lighting and cheap fabric, that's how you sell clothing.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

What a bunch of sniveling weasels.


9 posted on 10/02/2015 4:13:56 AM PDT by AdaGray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

This pope is to be ignored.

I am Catholic. And for the sake of the Catholic Church,
this pope is to be ignored. He is totally manipulated by evil forces.


10 posted on 10/02/2015 4:18:18 AM PDT by Maris Crane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: livius

Just wait for the Synod report.

When your supposed leaders won’t lead, the troops get rather upset.


11 posted on 10/02/2015 4:30:04 AM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: livius
This statement wouldn’t have been issued without the Pope’s approval.

I wouldn't assume this at all.

Among serious Catholics, it's no secret that the Vatican bureaucracy is filled with men -- even Cardinals -- who don't even believe in God.

I would take any public statements that come out of the Vatican with a huge grain of salt. Better yet -- I'd be inclined to ignore them.

12 posted on 10/02/2015 4:35:29 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("It doesn't work for me. I gotta have more cowbell!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: livius
This statement wouldn’t have been issued without the Pope’s approval. So in order to placate the gay mafia, he’s backing down on one of the two good things he did here.

This guy is an embarrassment.

13 posted on 10/02/2015 4:36:11 AM PDT by markomalley (Nothing emboldens the wicked so greatly as the lack of courage on the part of the good -- Leo XIII)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

“should not be considered a form of support of her position.”

Well, there you go. The Vatican is to chickensh$t to
come out and show support for people who stand up for
freedom of religion and who oppose the intolerant,
anti religious, homosexual agenda. They must be in
on it.


14 posted on 10/02/2015 4:38:51 AM PDT by Slambat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: livius
So which Papal Encyclical changed "Church Militant" to "Church Cowardly"???

Holy Spirit, paraclete, come down to protect the Church!
15 posted on 10/02/2015 4:40:25 AM PDT by mason-dixon (As Mason said to Dixon, you have to draw the line somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

I was holding my breath before this pope saw fit to make it clear that he wasn’t supporting a Christian practicing civil disobedience before going against God’s Word on what marriage is. I bet he wouldn’t feel the need to clarify his support of “sanctuary cities”, which are a violation of federal law that’s been going on for years.


16 posted on 10/02/2015 4:50:30 AM PDT by mrsmel (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: livius

Right, but decades of sanctuary cities for illegal aliens, in violation of federal law, that’s OK.


17 posted on 10/02/2015 4:52:10 AM PDT by mrsmel (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
Pope Francis' meeting with Kim Davis not a form of support, Vatican says

PWNED!


18 posted on 10/02/2015 5:03:35 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
in all of its particular and complex aspects
19 posted on 10/02/2015 5:26:03 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Wow. Again too cowardly to stand up for what is right and just. Cow to the left when you are left. Absolutely pathetic!


20 posted on 10/02/2015 5:35:06 AM PDT by vpintheak (A Free Man!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson