Skip to comments.
Pope Francis' meeting with Kim Davis not a form of support, Vatican says
Fox News ^
Posted on 10/02/2015 3:38:00 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
So the Pope OPPOSES Kim Davis? Is that why he met with her?
I suppose we can say that the Pope meeting with B Hussein Obama need not indicate support for Obama, then, right?
To: SoFloFreeper
Another part of the article:
News of the audience sent shockwaves through the U.S. church, with Davis' supporters saying it showed the pope backed her cause and opponents questioning whether the pope had been duped into meeting with her and truly knew the details of her case.
So this genius of a Pope, according to the left, got DUPED.
But B Hussein Obama hasn't been DUPED, eh, media?
To: SoFloFreeper
This statement wouldn’t have been issued without the Pope’s approval. So in order to placate the gay mafia, he’s backing down on one of the two good things he did here.
3
posted on
10/02/2015 3:41:31 AM PDT
by
livius
To: SoFloFreeper
Pope Francis' meeting with Kim Davis not a form of support, Vatican says. Then what was it?
To: SoFloFreeper
should not be considered a form of supportSo the Pope OPPOSES [?]
I think I've discovered your problem.
5
posted on
10/02/2015 3:45:58 AM PDT
by
1rudeboy
To: DoodleDawg
“Pope Francis’ meeting with Kim Davis not a form of support, Vatican says”
Yeah, Im sure Kim approved, initiated, arranged the meeting with Dear Pope. What a fricking coward this Pope is, amongst other things.
6
posted on
10/02/2015 3:48:27 AM PDT
by
DAC21
(.z)
To: SoFloFreeper
Perhaps the nuance filter on my Vatican Statement Disgronificator is malfunctioning again, but this sounds like Kim Davis just got thrown under at least one wheel of the Popemobile.
Mr. niteowl77
7
posted on
10/02/2015 4:00:08 AM PDT
by
niteowl77
("I wish I had better news for you, but the truth is that this thing is not worth fixing anymore.")
To: SoFloFreeper
8
posted on
10/02/2015 4:02:02 AM PDT
by
King Moonracer
(Bad lighting and cheap fabric, that's how you sell clothing.....)
To: SoFloFreeper
What a bunch of sniveling weasels.
9
posted on
10/02/2015 4:13:56 AM PDT
by
AdaGray
To: SoFloFreeper
This pope is to be ignored.
I am Catholic. And for the sake of the Catholic Church,
this pope is to be ignored. He is totally manipulated by evil forces.
To: livius
Just wait for the Synod report.
When your supposed leaders won’t lead, the troops get rather upset.
11
posted on
10/02/2015 4:30:04 AM PDT
by
redgolum
("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
To: livius
This statement wouldnt have been issued without the Popes approval. I wouldn't assume this at all.
Among serious Catholics, it's no secret that the Vatican bureaucracy is filled with men -- even Cardinals -- who don't even believe in God.
I would take any public statements that come out of the Vatican with a huge grain of salt. Better yet -- I'd be inclined to ignore them.
12
posted on
10/02/2015 4:35:29 AM PDT
by
Alberta's Child
("It doesn't work for me. I gotta have more cowbell!")
To: livius
This statement wouldnt have been issued without the Popes approval. So in order to placate the gay mafia, hes backing down on one of the two good things he did here. This guy is an embarrassment.
13
posted on
10/02/2015 4:36:11 AM PDT
by
markomalley
(Nothing emboldens the wicked so greatly as the lack of courage on the part of the good -- Leo XIII)
To: SoFloFreeper
“should not be considered a form of support of her position.”
Well, there you go. The Vatican is to chickensh$t to
come out and show support for people who stand up for
freedom of religion and who oppose the intolerant,
anti religious, homosexual agenda. They must be in
on it.
14
posted on
10/02/2015 4:38:51 AM PDT
by
Slambat
To: livius
So which Papal Encyclical changed "Church Militant" to "Church Cowardly"???
Holy Spirit, paraclete, come down to protect the Church!
15
posted on
10/02/2015 4:40:25 AM PDT
by
mason-dixon
(As Mason said to Dixon, you have to draw the line somewhere.)
To: SoFloFreeper
I was holding my breath before this pope saw fit to make it clear that he wasn’t supporting a Christian practicing civil disobedience before going against God’s Word on what marriage is. I bet he wouldn’t feel the need to clarify his support of “sanctuary cities”, which are a violation of federal law that’s been going on for years.
16
posted on
10/02/2015 4:50:30 AM PDT
by
mrsmel
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: livius
Right, but decades of sanctuary cities for illegal aliens, in violation of federal law, that’s OK.
17
posted on
10/02/2015 4:52:10 AM PDT
by
mrsmel
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: SoFloFreeper
Pope Francis' meeting with Kim Davis not a form of support, Vatican says
PWNED!
18
posted on
10/02/2015 5:03:35 AM PDT
by
Caipirabob
(Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
To: SoFloFreeper
in all of its particular and complex aspects
To: SoFloFreeper
Wow. Again too cowardly to stand up for what is right and just. Cow to the left when you are left. Absolutely pathetic!
20
posted on
10/02/2015 5:35:06 AM PDT
by
vpintheak
(A Free Man!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson