Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shale gas development in China aided by government investment and decreasing well cost
Energy Information Administration | SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 | Energy Information Administration

Posted on 09/30/2015 5:52:22 AM PDT by thackney

Decreases in the cost to drill shale gas wells and continued investment into domestic production have allowed China to increase its development of shale gas. Although reliance on natural gas imports has increased in the Chinese energy market, future shale gas production in China would help to meet natural gas demand as the country faces difficulties in developing other natural gas resources, including coalbed methane (CBM).

Over the past 25 years, China has attempted to develop its substantial CBM resources, estimated by China's Ministry of Land and Resources (MLR) at more than 1,000 trillion cubic feet (Tcf). Currently, there are more than 20,000 wells producing a total of 0.36 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d) of CBM in China. However, CBM well productivity in China is significantly lower than in countries such as Australia and the United States. CBM development in China has focused on the Ordos and Qinshui Basins of Shanxi Province. Although these two basins are considered to have China's best geologic conditions, they still face significant geologic challenges (low permeability, under-saturation) that reduce well productivity.

The difficulties faced in increasing CBM output have led China to increase its development of shale gas resources, taking a similar path toward shale development as it did with CBM. China's technically recoverable shale gas resources are estimated at 1,115 Tcf. The part of these resources that become economically recoverable resources will depend on the market price of natural gas from foreign sources, including both pipeline gas and liquefied natural gas, as well as the capital and operating costs and productivity of shale gas production within China. In the past four years there have been more than 700 shale gas wells drilled in China, reaching production levels of 0.38 Bcf/d.

As Chinese companies gain experience producing from shale, the cost of shale gas drilling has declined. By mid-2015, the cost of drilling a horizontal well in shale formations in the Sichuan Basin was between $11.3 million and $12.9 million per well, according to China National Petroleum Corporation's Economics and Technology Research Institute. This range was a 23% reduction in the cost of a shale gas well compared with the level in 2013 reports from Sinopec, one of China's national oil companies.

China has invested heavily in joint ventures in U.S. shale plays—China's financial involvement represents 20% of total foreign investment in U.S. shale plays. This investment likely has provided China with valuable expertise that can be applied to its own domestic production, helping to lower well development costs.

Decreasing well costs and increasing experience in developing shale gas have been supplemented with continued government investment in the development of shale gas. In 2012, to encourage the exploration of shale gas, the Chinese government established a four-year, $1.80 per million British thermal units subsidies program for any Chinese company reaching commercial production of shale gas. In mid-2015, these subsidies were extended to 2020, but at a lower rate.

While several international companies are actively working to develop shale gas in China, much of the effort has been led by Sinopec and PetroChina, two of China's national oil companies. Initial shale gas development has been focused on the Longmaxi formation in the Sichuan Basin, which is estimated to hold technically recoverable volumes of 287 Tcf. According to MLR, Sinopec and PetroChina are on schedule to reach 0.6 Bcf/d of shale gas production by the end of 2015. Although still a small fraction of China's overall production, estimated at 13.0 Bcf/d in 2014, increasing shale gas output could eventually help to meet growing demand for natural gas in China and to limit growth in the country's natural gas imports.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: energy; naturalgas; shale; subsidy


1 posted on 09/30/2015 5:52:22 AM PDT by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Before any suggest we should be spending government dollars the same way...

In the US, with private industry:

The average drilling and completion cost for Cabot’s 2015 program is expected to range between $6.0 million and $6.5 million per well for an average lateral length of 5,300 feet and reflects the impact of recent operating efficiency gains and recently negotiated reductions in service costs.

http://marcellusdrilling.com/2015/02/cabot-cuts-2015-budget-44-will-drill-70-new-marcellus-wells/


2 posted on 09/30/2015 5:55:48 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney
Caprereture
3 posted on 09/30/2015 6:02:18 AM PDT by smartyaz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: smartyaz

Natural Gas, not gasoline.


4 posted on 09/30/2015 6:03:02 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Chinese have very few alternatives to keep their economy chugging and to prop up employment.

Developing one’s own resources is a smart way to do it.


5 posted on 09/30/2015 6:08:39 AM PDT by bestintxas (every time a RINO loses, a founding father gets his wings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Gosh isn’t government wonderful!

We should let the government pay for drilling here!!

I am sure it will be cheaper, and be done more wisely once all their environmental rules are applied

For example, for ultimate safety to the environment they could regulate that you can drill anywhere there are people or where there might be messy oil.


6 posted on 09/30/2015 6:24:00 AM PDT by Mr. K (If it is HilLIARy -vs- Jeb! then I am writing-in Palin/Cruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bestintxas

If they are able to produce their own oil and natural gas, the oil industry would be decimated, as would the price of gas.


7 posted on 09/30/2015 6:29:38 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

“If they are able to produce their own oil and natural gas, the oil industry would be decimated, as would the price of gas.”

What oil industry are you referring to? China’s?


8 posted on 09/30/2015 7:23:11 AM PDT by bestintxas (every time a RINO loses, a founding father gets his wings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bestintxas

The world’s.


9 posted on 09/30/2015 8:09:24 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

China paying for producing its own hydrocarbons won’t ‘decimate’ the industry. The world is quite large and taking one albeit player out of it will hurt but not terminally.

A much, much larger negative event happened to the oil industry many years ago when the countries in OPEC decided to nationalize their resources, which took most of the world’s reserves out of those oil companies’ hands.

The companies shrunk and redirected, but were not ‘decimated’.


10 posted on 09/30/2015 12:54:09 PM PDT by bestintxas (every time a RINO loses, a founding father gets his wings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bestintxas

Maybe I meant “really, really seriously damaged”, or just “really seriously damaged”, or just “seriously damaged.”

Or maybe I meant “torpedoed.” :-)


11 posted on 10/01/2015 5:20:23 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

I think not anything much will happen, as most of the world needs the expertise of the oil companies.

That includes China.


12 posted on 10/01/2015 12:35:20 PM PDT by bestintxas (every time a RINO loses, a founding father gets his wings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson