Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sauropod
Don’t agree. We still have tactical nukes, last I looked.

You think that using tactical nukes in that theater of operations can be contained and will not be expanded into other regions?

If tactical nukes were authorized and used against any Russian target, you can rest assured they will respond in kind. You might think they would turn tail and slink away, but unless Putin is an abject coward, that won't happen. Even if Putin backed down after a humiliating tactical nuke defeat, you can bet he would be disposed of within 24 hours and the resulting Russian nationalism would demand an equivalent or greater retaliation against U.S. forces.

At that point, all bets are off.
72 posted on 09/30/2015 5:17:23 AM PDT by mkjessup (If you really support Ted Cruz, don't be trashing Trump, Cruz doesn't, why should you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: mkjessup

So, we let the Bear just take over this province and that defenseless state?

Ears has been doing that. A bad strategy.

The Bear is still hungry.


77 posted on 09/30/2015 5:20:11 AM PDT by sauropod (I am His and He is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

To: mkjessup

We still have more forces than Russia here, and retaliation would be immediate and exponential. Obama has led us to the very brink of WWIII. His foreign policy blunders makes Jimmy Carter look like a savant in retrospect.


201 posted on 09/30/2015 7:39:54 AM PDT by antidisestablishment (If Washington was judged with the same standard as Sodom, it would not exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson