Tell me why, if the “messenger” proves himself to incompetent and a repeated failure why I should waste my time on what he is alleging? Under your theory we should pay attention every time “the boy cries wolf”.
Larry Klayman talks the talk but finds himself thrown out of court or defeated constantly. I’m sure you think it’s great to “fight the good fight”, but I’d much rather it be someone who has some idea of HOW to fight.
So is Klayman right or wrong about Rubio?
That is the bottom line. Feel free to articulate your position.