Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Political Junkie Too

You are probably correct.

It wasn’t supposed to be too difficult to convene the states. Two thirds is high but not too high when there is general agreement the government needs fixing.


105 posted on 09/29/2015 1:34:26 PM PDT by Jacquerie ( To shun Article V is to embrace tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]


To: Jacquerie
Then the concept of "local interest" amendments goes against the idea of "same-subject" applications.

I wish more was written about Article 5 in the Federalist Papers. Perhaps there is more in the ratifying debates?

-PJ

106 posted on 09/29/2015 2:10:52 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson