Since you won't I will. THREE other polls not only have Trump winning, but winning by 40-50 points. So you can take the average if you want and Fiorina still isn't even in the same room.
Hey, why did Trump back down to Fiorina on her face issue, why didn't he double down? I thought he could speak his mind and stand up to the media? Why didn't he say she was the ugliest woman he's ever seen and start making barking noises? Or why didn't he have dogs released into the audience with Fiorina name tags? Why is he being so P.C. and conventional politician?
Internet “polls” are not scientific polls. They are MEANINGLESS. It’s amazing that someone who’s been on this forum since 1998 still doesn’t understand the science of polls.
This poll is scientific and the results make perfect sense. Trump was outshined by almost every other candidate last night. He had nothing new to say and showed a lack of depth on most of the issues.
Rubio and Fiorina, whatever their faults as candidates, simply did a better job answering the questions.
The poll shows Trump was considered the second place winner of the debate, but also the second place loser. He’s polarizing. He’s showing signs of sinking to the same thing that dogged him from the beginning of his candidacy, his extremely high negatives.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/281579691/One-America-News-Gravis-Marketing-Post-Debate
The polls you are referring to are not scientific polls and are for personal amusement only. For example, the Drudge poll is not scientific. I voted for Trump three times on three different devices. I voted for Trump only because he drives the establishment nuts. It is unlikely I will vote for Trump for county clerk much less president.
What exactly are debate watchers? How could they possibly know this quickly?
I'm interested: which polls are you referring to?
For clarification: Are you referring to winning as in the debate or winning as in primary or winning as in general, or..?