Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LeeClementineKenny; CatherineofAragon; Semper Mark; Finalapproach29er; fr_freak
I agree with Coulter on this. I support Israel as an ally, but I get sick of hearing politicians pander to Israel to such an extreme extent. It's no different than hearing Jeb pander to Mexico.

What an asinine thing to say! Do you (and Ann) think Jews are the only ones who care about Israel? I admit that I, a gentile, have divided loyalties. I've never stepped foot in Israel, but I care deeply and profoundly about the nation of Israel and the Jewish people. It matters a great deal to me how resolutely the candidates align themselves with the plight of Israel in these extremely troubled times.

The next president is going to have to undo a lot of damage that the puppet of satan who sits in our White House has done during his administration. That you and Ann the Hideous think addressing Israel in this election discussion is pandering is frighteningly telling. Perhaps satan's puppet has been more effective than I could have imagined. Not a surprise though. A couple of thousand years ago, God told us these kinds of things would happen.

Maranatha.

208 posted on 09/17/2015 8:59:31 PM PDT by ru4liberty (Trump's age: chronological = 69 YO; emotional = 10 YO. Frickin' embarrassing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: ru4liberty
Obviously she doesn't think only Jews care about Israel -- hence the question how many Jews are here. In fact, and she knows this, they are a small fraction of the US population and a minute percentage of Republican voters. 70% of Jews voted for "satan's puppet" in the last election.

Do you not think it's a bit bizarre that you feel the need to "undo the damage" done to Israel by a man the vast majority of Jewish-Americans voted for and you're not even Jewish, much less an Israeli citizen?
209 posted on 09/17/2015 9:24:34 PM PDT by Publius22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies ]

To: ru4liberty

As a conservative I’m a strong believer in freedom of speech and the right to criticize, debate or say anything about anyone or any group even if it offends. Freedom of speech is the right to be offended. Wasn’t Freedom of Speech (unlike Eurpe, etc) a fundamental tenant? Did our founding fathers tell the settlers not to call the Indians fxxxxxx native Americans. We appear to be quickly losing that right and it is a slippery slope to leftist-dom.

Is it true that the leftist elites would like to enact laws that would restrict what one says, and require that a muzzle be applied by a judicial body of political correctness to ensure that no one is offended.

In my view it should make no difference what was said or about whom or what group....if we truly accept freedom. Names and words do not hurt, but sticks and stones do. Conservatism to me will never include some hyper concern about hurt feelings or the need for a PC muzzle at the expense of our right to opinions. If that is the way she felt about it then it should be discussed and not muzzled.


210 posted on 09/17/2015 9:36:35 PM PDT by apoliticalone (Politicians need to pander to all the American citizens, not illegals, global corps, or oligarchs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies ]

To: ru4liberty

Easy.I’m on your side here.


211 posted on 09/17/2015 10:26:58 PM PDT by Finalapproach29er (luke 6:38)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson