To: quadrant
Jefferson Davis had no desire to march on Washington and replace Lincoln. What Ive read about the First Battle of Bull Run, the confederates had a tactical opportunity to get to Washington in the aftermath of the Union defeat. Stonewall Jackson wanted to pursue, but was ordered not to.
27 posted on
09/16/2015 11:29:55 AM PDT by
conservatism_IS_compassion
('Liberalism' is a conspiracy against the public by wire-service journalism.)
To: conservatism_IS_compassion
What Ive read about the First Battle of Bull Run, the confederates had a tactical opportunity to get to Washington in the aftermath of the Union defeat. Stonewall Jackson wanted to pursue, but was ordered not to. Both armies were 1)green, and 2)well beat-up after the battle. Jackson couldn't have done it single-handed.
31 posted on
09/16/2015 7:50:35 PM PDT by
thulldud
(Is it "alter or abolish" time yet?)
To: conservatism_IS_compassion
As I said, the aims of the Confederacy were quite limited, which they would not have been if they considered themselves involved in a civil war. Generally, civil wars have unlimited aims, which wars of secession do not.
32 posted on
09/17/2015 1:02:05 PM PDT by
quadrant
(1o)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson