Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: quadrant
Jefferson Davis had no desire to march on Washington and replace Lincoln.
What I’ve read about the First Battle of Bull Run, the confederates had a tactical opportunity to get to Washington in the aftermath of the Union defeat. Stonewall Jackson wanted to pursue, but was ordered not to.

27 posted on 09/16/2015 11:29:55 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion ('Liberalism' is a conspiracy against the public by wire-service journalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: conservatism_IS_compassion
What I’ve read about the First Battle of Bull Run, the confederates had a tactical opportunity to get to Washington in the aftermath of the Union defeat. Stonewall Jackson wanted to pursue, but was ordered not to.

Both armies were 1)green, and 2)well beat-up after the battle. Jackson couldn't have done it single-handed.

31 posted on 09/16/2015 7:50:35 PM PDT by thulldud (Is it "alter or abolish" time yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion
As I said, the aims of the Confederacy were quite limited, which they would not have been if they considered themselves involved in a civil war. Generally, civil wars have unlimited aims, which wars of secession do not.
32 posted on 09/17/2015 1:02:05 PM PDT by quadrant (1o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson