If I’m not mistaken, Obama and/ or his administration researched and found that there were some, don’t know how many, but some that were titled “deals,agreements,understandings” AND SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN.
When I first heard this I was shocked.
Trying to find ways to avoid the restrictive vote that is on Treaties. That’s when Corker came in.
The point is, the title doesn’t define whether it’s a treaty or not. If it did, why would a president ever call it a treaty when they could get the same result but without having to subject it to a vote.