Skip to comments.
Statement of Kentucky Clerk Kim Davis - It's a Heaven or Hell decision.
Liberty Counsel ^
| September 1, 2015
| Kim Davis
Posted on 09/04/2015 1:36:53 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-163 next last
To: Jim Robinson
When she ran for the clerk’s office the law was no gay “marriage”. Now the law is to issue gay “marriage” licenses. That is the change in the law that she did not bargain for when she ran.
121
posted on
09/04/2015 8:39:04 PM PDT
by
annalex
(fear them not)
To: annalex
Do you have a copy of the actual text of the new law?
122
posted on
09/04/2015 8:43:45 PM PDT
by
Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!)
To: Cold Heat
Thanks for that link.....good information.
123
posted on
09/04/2015 8:58:32 PM PDT
by
Girlene
To: Girlene
You can signup for their news releases...they don’t share info and you get only what you ask for..
124
posted on
09/04/2015 9:02:00 PM PDT
by
Cold Heat
(For Rent....call 1-555-tagline)
To: Jim Robinson
You have to love asking that question....lol
125
posted on
09/04/2015 9:03:11 PM PDT
by
Cold Heat
(For Rent....call 1-555-tagline)
To: Jim Robinson
No, I don’t. Tell me: what changed between she got elected and now?
126
posted on
09/04/2015 9:07:03 PM PDT
by
annalex
(fear them not)
To: Jim Robinson
127
posted on
09/04/2015 9:12:18 PM PDT
by
444Flyer
(How long O LORD?)
To: Cold Heat
128
posted on
09/04/2015 9:13:32 PM PDT
by
Girlene
To: annalex
Nothing that I know of pertaining to the actual law in question. Looks like the state legislature has not passed a new law on this. I could be wrong about that, but I haven’t seen any reports to the contrary.
129
posted on
09/04/2015 9:14:42 PM PDT
by
Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!)
To: Jim Robinson
Ah, right. Sorry to be dense. But don’t you agree that when she ran, the legal climate was that marriage was between a man and a woman, and due to the Supreme Court abomination — let’s not call it law — she is now asked to do gay “marriages”? So she is upholding the law, and those who say that she must do her job under these changed circumstances are wrong on the facts and on the logic.
130
posted on
09/04/2015 9:30:16 PM PDT
by
annalex
(fear them not)
To: annalex
131
posted on
09/04/2015 9:33:48 PM PDT
by
Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!)
To: annalex
Marriage is one man, one woman regardless of attempted judicial tyranny. This ruling is every bit as wrong as Dred Scott. Hoping the recourse in this case is not as expensive as that one.
132
posted on
09/04/2015 9:38:34 PM PDT
by
Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!)
To: annalex
The founders never ever intended the Feds or the SCOTUS to wield unlimited powers over the people. This is straight up fascist tyranny.
133
posted on
09/04/2015 9:40:52 PM PDT
by
Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!)
To: prairiebreeze
"...Jesus has a real soft-spot in his heart for sinners and if this woman is an example of a life turned around because of him, then all the glory to the Savior..."
134
posted on
09/04/2015 9:44:45 PM PDT
by
444Flyer
(How long O LORD?)
To: Jim Robinson
"Marriage is one man, one woman regardless of attempted judicial tyranny. This ruling is every bit as wrong as Dred Scott. Hoping the recourse in this case is not as expensive as that one."
Quote of the year!
135
posted on
09/04/2015 11:16:49 PM PDT
by
boop
(A joke? The hell kind of joke is that? 'Bout as funny as a gutful of pinworms!)
To: Nep Nep
I don’t know what’s in her mind, Nep Nep. But perhaps it was about taking a stand, about professing her faith?
She may well need the paycheck (who doesn’t, in these times), but perhaps she was moved to draw a line in the sand.
She may have sought attention, but I don’t think she wanted that for herself.
136
posted on
09/04/2015 11:55:28 PM PDT
by
proud American in Canada
(May every person have the chance, every day, to listen to the sound of children laughing in play.)
To: Jim Robinson
Sorry, the woman is a phony. She’s been married and divorced 4 times. She does not give a damn about marriage. I’m 52, I’ve known countless people, I can’t even count even once how many people I know who have been divorced more than one time. I don’t know ANYONE who has been divorced more than once. This woman on the other hand has been divorced FOUR TIMES. And she’s dictating about marriage? We don’t need someone like her speaking about marriage. She comes across to me as someone who is solely using religion to garner attention.
http://m.snopes.com/kim-davis-married-four-times/
137
posted on
09/05/2015 12:11:55 AM PDT
by
GrandJediMasterYoda
(B. Hussein Obama: 20 acts of Treason and counting.)
To: Jim Robinson
It bothers me that Kim is a Democrat. Something is just not sitting right with me on this. Is she saying she can no longer support her party?
To: GrandJediMasterYoda
You might want to read her complete statement again. She’s now a devout Christian and her past is behind her.
139
posted on
09/05/2015 1:23:42 AM PDT
by
Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!)
To: Boardwalk
Her faith is at odds with the godless democrat abortionist/homosexualist agenda. If she’s still a democrat, doubt she’ll remain one much longer.
140
posted on
09/05/2015 1:26:44 AM PDT
by
Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-163 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson