Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

Okay, as far as letting the states decide, SCOTUS has overruled the states. So the remedy to that is to execute one of the checks on judicial power. Impeachment, removal of authority, etc.

NC opt out law probably hasn’t yet been tested with a federal challenge. Unless it provides a remedy such as an alternative process or person whereby SCOTUS’s abominated ruling can be satisfied, it too will be overruled by federal courts.

But a Federal version of that NC law is certainly worth trying.


238 posted on 09/04/2015 12:11:29 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies ]


To: DannyTN

RE: But a Federal version of that NC law is certainly worth trying.

This SHOULD BE DONE PRONTO. I can already see what’s going to happen to say, Military Chaplains ( effectively under Uncle Sam’s pay ) who refuse to solemnize gay weddings.

This will affect not only Christians, but Muslims and Jewish chaplains as well.

Just one of the many problems I foresaw when those 5 black robed judges decided to impose gay marraige on the country.

Here’s the rub — WHAT IF SUCH A LAW IS PASSED AND SAY, A PRESIDENT CRUZ SIGNS IT, AND THE ACLU CHALLENGES THIS LAW AND IT GOES TO THE SCOTUS?

This will then be Executive/Legislature vs Supreme Court.

What happens then?

And where in the constitution does it say that the SCOTUS decision overrides the will of the legislature who are accountable to the people?


240 posted on 09/04/2015 12:16:30 PM PDT by SeekAndFind (What is the difference between Obama and government bonds? Government bonds will mature someday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson