Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Crystal Palace East

That’s not the moral equivalency here. She is refusing to put her name to something she believes is a sinful act.


20 posted on 09/04/2015 12:36:55 PM PDT by hope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: hope

Great.

What about an elected official sheriff arresting men and women who have affairs because that is a sinful act which violates the Ten Commandments?

What about the same elected official refusing to put her name on a Certificate of Occupancy or Public Housing lease for a couple “living in sin.”

Is the same elected official permitted to refuse a business permit to a restaurant open on Saturday if that elected official is a Orthodox Jew or 7th Day Adventist..... because in both faiths, it’s a sin for ANYONE to work on the Sabbath.

Can a Muslim elected official refuse a business permit for Peter’s House of Perfect Pork Dinners because it is a sin for anyone to eat pork?

Law and religion; always a bad mix.


22 posted on 09/04/2015 12:46:46 PM PDT by Crystal Palace East (Are Crybaby Conservatives, calling everyone else RINOs, really Dems trying to get you to not vote?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson