Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ObozoMustGo2012

I went back and forth on this all day and if she is against this, then she needs to quit. She is an employee of the state, and if the state is ordering you to do X, then you do it or stop working there.

Should she be in jail? No.

Does she think she can just ignore a directive from the higher ups and still keep her job? Nope.

She is an elected official, but she isn’t a legislator or a executive, charged with the ability to ignore whatever she wants, no matter how odious it is personally.


96 posted on 09/04/2015 6:05:25 AM PDT by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: VanDeKoik

The Supreme Court decision did not change Kentucky law, it voided it. The LAW in Kentucky regarding marriage is that in order to get a marriage license the applicant must be two adults of the opposite sex who are not immediately blood related. The Kentucky statute that authorizes the county clerk to issue marriage licenses to anyone does not authorize her to issue a license to same sex couples. If the Supreme Court determined that the Kentucky statute was unconstitutional, then the county clerk cannot issue any marriage license at all. She isn’t. She is currently obeying the law by not issuing licenses because she currently has no authority to do so.

Your position is one that gives the Supreme Court LEGISLATIVE POWER which it does not have. Forcing this clerk to issue marriage licenses is an unconstitutional act. The court has no power to require a county clerk to violate an existing Kentucky Statute and if the statute is void, then it has no power to make up some statute that requires the state to issue marriage licenses in accordance with a void statute.

I get pretty sick and tired of people on this forum saying that this clerk needs to follow the law or quit her job. SHE’S DOING HER JOB!!!! Her job is to follow the statutory law and right now there isn’t one.

Unless and until KENTUCKY passes a law re-authorizing the issuance of marriage licenses, no clerk in Kentucky should be issuing marriage licenses to anyone.

If you disagree, then show me the currently existing statute that authorizes county clerks in Kentucky to issue marriage licenses to anyone.

The problem is not that the clerk is not following the law, THE COURTS ARE MAKING UP THE LAW. THEY HAVE NO AUTHORITY TO DO SO!!! If anyone should be quitting their jobs, it is the judges!!!!


101 posted on 09/04/2015 6:06:51 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (Tagline pending.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

To: VanDeKoik
Does she think she can just ignore a directive from the higher ups and still keep her job? Nope.

By law her signature will be on any marriage license issued from her office.

And who the Hell are her "Higher ups"? The Federal Courts? Who elected this judge? Where does he get his authority to force this woman to issue marriage licenses? How is this a Federal issue when she is simply not issuing any licenses to anyone?

122 posted on 09/04/2015 6:15:26 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (Tagline pending.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson