You’re just repeating yourself at this point.
“Your question assumes that (1) the man was an illegal; (2) that the Man knew the person who stole his sign was a “guard” and (3) the man knew the guy who stole his sign was armed and (4) he knew exactly where he had put his concealed weapon.”
1. Doesn’t matter.
2. Doesn’t matter.
3. Doesn’t matter.
4. doesn’t matter.
The definition of reasonable force is subjective and would be decided in a court of law. Deal with it.
Then why are you here deciding it for us?
I have simply posted the law and stated my observations from viewing the film. If I was a District Attorney and the film was the only evidence, I think I would have to charge the guard with Third Degree Robbery.
Did that sign belong to the guard or did he steal it. That is the issue. I don't believe you can possibly claim that the sign belonged to the guard.
What do you call it when some thug steals your protest sign and walks away with it?
Free Republic will continue the fight for Liberty and against godless socialism and fascist judges!
September 3, 2015 | Jim Robinson
Posted on Thursday, September 03, 2015 5:39:43 PM by Jim Robinson
I stand with Kim Davis! I will not comply!
more...