Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bayard

““I don’t know for sure,” said Chattanooga attorney Mike Richardson, “but I suspect the U.S. Supreme Court did not intend to preempt divorce law.””

Idiots. I could probably do way better at serving on the SCOTUS without any law training. I know how to think things through, at least.


22 posted on 09/03/2015 11:18:06 PM PDT by Politicalkiddo ("Rejoice not against me, O mine enemy; when I fall I shall arise"-Bunyan's Pilgrim's Progress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Politicalkiddo
Idiots. I could probably do way better at serving on the SCOTUS without any law training.
That's just one of the many problems. There are no "law training" requirements to be appointed to SCOTUS.
23 posted on 09/04/2015 12:28:29 AM PDT by lewislynn (Meghan Kelley...#sand--Rosie, the Don was right-- Hillary, lipstick on a pig)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson