Replies

To: Hojczyk

So what was held over the heads of the Congress to change the law from being two thirds to pass instead of two thirds to prevent?

Something disturbing happened here.

3 posted on 09/02/2015 8:59:37 AM PDT by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women)

To: A CA Guy

the GOPE wanted to ensure it passed and did not want the constitutional protections to hinder their personal power.

5 posted on 09/02/2015 9:00:56 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)

To: A CA Guy

It’s the Chicago way. Bribery or coercion. Both work.

6 posted on 09/02/2015 9:01:09 AM PDT by fatnotlazy

To: A CA Guy

Yes, extremely disturbing.

7 posted on 09/02/2015 9:01:55 AM PDT by ColdOne (I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11 HillaryForPrison2016)

To: A CA Guy

So what was held over the heads of the Congress to change the law from being two thirds to pass instead of two thirds to prevent?

Something disturbing happened here.

Yes!!!

Question should be asked over and over again until the answer is revealed.

Why would a Republican-controlled Senate give up some of its constitutional power to this out-of-control president?

Nobody appears to be asking. Nobody!

35 posted on 09/02/2015 9:44:30 AM PDT by JohnG45

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794