Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp

If you disagree with the court you always have an option. But the employer has the option to fire you. Make your decision and live with the consequences. You don’t use your religious belief to control the business or limit the services of your employer. That is a violation of the employers rights. If it is a public agency you would be forcing to agency to do something the courts have ruled is illegal.

Don’t obey the laws you don’t like. Be ready to serve time and don’t expect the world to change around you. If we all go to jail then you have something. But you can see from the small number who refuse to issue iciness, it’s not going to happen in this case on this issue.

I am no longer a libertarian. I would think Libertarians would support the right of the employer and in this case the responsibility to carry out case law.


67 posted on 08/31/2015 7:10:20 PM PDT by morphing libertarian (defund Obama care and amnesty. Impeach for Benghazi and IRS and fast and furious.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: morphing libertarian
If it is a public agency you would be forcing to agency to do something the courts have ruled is illegal.

They are ruling me and my kind illegal. We are the "new Jews" and they are ushering in Kristallnacht. At this point we need to quit worrying about this game of liars poker and just start trying to wreck these people in any way we can.

I do not regard the supreme court as the final arbiter. If they rule against "the laws of nature, and of Nature's God" then they are going to lose in the long run anyways.

I need not throw my lot in with them by paying respect to their power grab.

I am no longer a libertarian. I would think Libertarians would support the right of the employer and in this case the responsibility to carry out case law.

When Libertarians wake up, they discover that you can't have a functional fiscal system without a functional social system underpinning it.

As I often point out, Adam Smith and Edmund Burke were not only contemporaries, but close personal friends. They discussed philosophy with each other, and their works are intended to be taken together synergistically rather than as separate philosophies.

88 posted on 08/31/2015 7:41:27 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

To: morphing libertarian

“I am no longer a libertarian. I would think Libertarians would support the right of the employer and in this case the responsibility to carry out case law.”

You may claim you are no longer a libertarian - but all the same you think and write as one. So if case law rules that we must kill the elderly and sick, then I see you will be first on the block with your Kevorkian Mercy Kit.


128 posted on 08/31/2015 8:23:39 PM PDT by WTFOVR (I find myself exclaiming that expression quite often these days!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

To: morphing libertarian

Who is the employer???


159 posted on 08/31/2015 9:26:58 PM PDT by Theophilus (Be as prolific as you are pro-life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson