Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Uncle Miltie

Religious test for holding a public job.


The problem is that part of your job is against your religion. It’s like being the Mormon soda jerk at a soda fountain that just started selling booze. You can’t just say, “I refuse to serve booze. You have to find another job. A job that does not violate your religious convictions.

And I’m with everyone here regarding the depravity of the SCOTUS and, frankly, our culture. But the rules really are pretty clear.


54 posted on 08/31/2015 6:32:49 PM PDT by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: cuban leaf
Religious test for holding a public job.

But that's just it. The Supreme Court has now created a religious test. If you are a member of the Dominant religion, you can now no longer hold public office.

With a Constitution that ends with "year of our Lord" and exempts the President from working on the Christian Sabbath day, it is insane to believe there can be any ban to Christians holding public office. But now there is.

58 posted on 08/31/2015 6:44:14 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

To: cuban leaf

“But the rules really are pretty clear.”

So, your argument distills down to “I was just following orders”

OK, so you go ahead an obey those “rules” - aka unjust laws ... I have a different solution in mind - it calls for the proper placement of maximum firepower. I like that option much better.


119 posted on 08/31/2015 8:09:41 PM PDT by WTFOVR (I find myself exclaiming that expression quite often these days!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson