Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Red in Blue PA

It couldn’t be that the gun was popular with 3 generations of vets because they are used to it? That the army uses the design because it’s ergonomically easier to use? Nope. It’s a plot by evil gun industry!


4 posted on 08/31/2015 2:45:34 PM PDT by Hugin ("First thing--get yourself a firearm!" Sheriff Ed Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Hugin

***the gun was popular with 3 generations of vets because they are used to it?***

I shot my first M-16 in 1966 USAF. Bought my first AR-15 in 1970. $200.00. Wish I still had it.

Back then, no one wanted a .223 rifle and they were a hard sell. Gun editors railed against them as being under powered, inaccurate and basically useless. Everyone wanted deer rifles.

Then Mel Tappan published his book on SURVIVAL GUNS, and wrote a survival column for GUNS AND AMMO magazine. Suddenly everyone wanted a .223 semi auto rifle!

I bought one of the first Ruger Mini-14s and soon they disappeared from the shelves. I had to sell mine to keep from starving, and later found Ruger was sending all they made then to police forces in France.


31 posted on 08/31/2015 4:49:53 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson