You obviously do not understand the nature of "proof." Pretending data points, liberally mixed with hyperbole, constitutes proof is indeed "histrionics."
I’m talking published writings that show me anything but a status quo mouthpiece. The problem is, even at your advance age, I am way ahead of you and you can’t handle it.
Proof is proof....time and dated published materials are proof....I could bomb you with thousands of items.....but you’re not man enough to admit that your accusation was wrong......that low t thing again I guess.