Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Impy

I wouldn’t see the point of even doing a referendum in AK, it would be a waste of taxpayer $$ to ascertain that probably 90% would favor “Denali.” The local papers could do an online survey and it would reflect that.

I like President McKinley, but the name never did stick, and the Ohio delegation was perennially trying to stop something the folks in Alaska didn’t want. If they’re wanting to honor him so badly in Ohio, name something monumental for him there that the locals will approve of.


124 posted on 09/01/2015 1:41:13 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]


To: fieldmarshaldj

I didn’t suggest a separate referendum, but putting the question on the next general election ballot, I don’t see why that should cost any significant amount of money?

But whatever forgrt that, sounds to me that it’s purview of Congress to change the name of national landmarks, not Obama, he’s abusing his office, again. I refuse to not be bothered by that.


144 posted on 09/01/2015 10:10:13 PM PDT by Impy (They pull a knife, you pull a gun. That's the CHICAGO WAY, and that's how you beat the rats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson