To: Elderberry
"No innocent civilians or law enforcement were injured during the shootout. "
Really? Where is the proof of that?
12 posted on
08/29/2015 6:44:32 PM PDT by
Paladin2
(Ive given up on aphostrophys and spell chek on my current device...)
To: Paladin2
That’s one claim that they’ll have Hell proving.
To: Paladin2
"No innocent civilians or law enforcement were injured during the shootout. " Yeah, that whopper really stood out.
No innocent civilians were injured? Really? what about killed? When was the guilt or innocence of those injured established?
Crazy stuff going on.
48 posted on
08/29/2015 11:29:55 PM PDT by
Finny
(Be ready to own what you vote for. Voting "against" is imaginary.)
To: Paladin2
Thus sayeth the almighty BATF in accordance with the laws of their father, Beelzebub.
“So let it be written, so let it be done.”
To: Paladin2
"No innocent civilians or law enforcement were injured during the shootout. "Really? Where is the proof of that?
The writer's statement presumes anyone injured was not innocent.
That ranks up there with "Of course he's guilty, your Honor. We shot him didn't we?"
126 posted on
08/30/2015 1:38:53 PM PDT by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson