Can one engage in original thought while snoring?
Posted on 08/28/2015 6:56:25 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
As a seminal thinker Thomas is leading the court in a consistently constitutional direction especially regarding the first, second and fourth amendments. His intellect is superior to each of the sitting liberal judges and ranks as high as any who have ever served.
Leftists are right to worry about Thomas. He is one of the most important intellects and constitutional scholars on the court.
“All the news that fits our agenda,” courtesy, the New York Slime.
Well, after all we know that a certain spoiled rich kid from Honolulu who grew up in gated country club surroundings with his white mother and her very well to do parents represents the black experience far more than Clarence Thomas (who was raised in very simple surroundings in Atlanta by his grandfather) (sarc big time).
Use the linguistic hardware to compare the “original” taking points between the White Hut, the NYT and the alphabet networks.
Taking = talking
Can one engage in original thought while snoring?
The same software shows Obama’s book “Dreams From My Father was not written by Obama, but by Bill Ayers.
Huh? Several of the briefs I’ve read contain quotes from previous opinions.. When they did this new study, was anything directly quoted removed from the recent opinions, as that isn’t plagiarism, that’s quoting from source material.
You got a problem with that?
:}
FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.
Maybe CT has a better memory and relies on the language of previous court briefs to avoid confusion.
removed by moderator
The NYT can run drivel like this as few of their readers actually read court opinions. If they did they would know Thomas for his solid contribution to the history of the court .
“All the news that fits our agenda,” courtesy, the New York Slime. Or: We only print the “news” that fits our agenda.
I can’t remember if it was Levin or Limbaugh who said Thomas had the best written opinions. I want to say it was Levin. He said they invariably were the most principled and also the pithiest — getting the point across with the fewest words. He said his opinions were like primers on the correct conservative way of looking at things. So it’s no wonder he’s in the libtards’ crosshairs. That and the fact that he blows up all their moronic racial narratives.
How about turning that methodology on Hillary’s “speeches”?
Supreme Court Justices don’t right their own decisions— that is what clerks are for anyway— sad the New York Times would try to smear a supreme court justice like that..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.