Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/27/2015 12:59:43 PM PDT by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: thackney

I note that Item 6 misleads by implying strongly that the country of Australia invested the $200bn. It was done almost exclusively by oil companies.

Nowhere in this article did I read about the increasingly environmental aspect of LNG: it is a preferred resource due to its ‘clean’ footprint compared to coal, nuclear.

My prediction is that Qatar will suffer as it is enveloped in the ME quagmire. Just too much money in fixed facilities subject to terrorism or bombing.

Australia will be in better shape due to its relatively docile nature. USA just has too much usage to justify itself as a major exporter.

I would bet on the land down under.


2 posted on 08/27/2015 1:29:14 PM PDT by bestintxas (every time a RINO loses, a founding father gets his wings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson