On a matter of Constitutional law, you're calling quotes with citations to U.S. Congressional history and quotes from the U.S. Supreme Court "fantasy?" Desperate times call for desperate arguments, don't they?
This is a classic illustration of why you are rightfully dismissed as an illogical loon. You reject anything -- even from authorities most EVERYONE ELSE considers HIGHLY RELEVANT -- as "fantasy."
But I like that you keep it up. It just so much fun making a post where I call you a "fool," "daft," "evasive," an "historical illiterate," "intellectually lazy," "incompetent" -- in short holding you up for public mockery -- and watch as you simply have to tuck your tail between your legs and slither away because you KNOW you've got no substantive reply to the points I'm making which kill your argument.
It's fun. It really is. :)
If you are citing them, then a significant "fantasy" component is incorporated into their usage.
Any one who is IDIOT enough to cite Lynch v Clarke, cannot be taken seriously. The Legislature of New York overturned that stupid pile of crap.