Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Norm Lenhart

Hillary didn’t lose in 08 because Obama was such a great candidate. Obama won because Hillary was so lousy. She just isn’t likable, even for Democrats. That’s why Bernie Sanders was surging even before the latest email revelations. If Elizabeth Warren had decided to run Hillary would be toast already.


20 posted on 08/26/2015 2:02:54 PM PDT by Hugin ("First thing--get yourself a firearm!" Sheriff Ed Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Hugin

Sure but there is a fundamental flaw with that argument. You are looking at this from what people want. I’m looking at this from what best advances the liberal agenda.

Advanced socialism, AKA communism, requires a Hillary at the helm. She’s bloodthirsty. Sanders and Fauxahontis are useful idiot types. Hillary will ‘rule’. They would ‘be ruled’. And the power structure of the world wants America ‘ruled’. Thus she remains viable until a more Putin like Dem emerges. Thats why Barry got the drooling sycophancy from world leaders. It was because he does what they want for us.

The libs on the ground may want sanders. When do useful idiots in a communist revolution ever get a say? The only say they get is “BUT I’M ON YOUR SIDE!!!” before being shot in the head by their leaders’ troops.


22 posted on 08/26/2015 2:09:34 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson