Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Slyfox
Roe v. Wade needs to be re-visited with all of the updated medical facts.

I disagree. From a constitutional perspective the medical facts are really not relevant. It needs to be revisited by 9 jurists that have an understanding of, and respect for, the US Constitution.

The first and primary reason R vs W needs to go is that it is simply bad law and undermines the Constitution.

13 posted on 08/26/2015 10:39:57 AM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s, you weren't really there....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: ChildOfThe60s

I believe that the Lord will come back before there are 9 SC justices willing to revisit it.


14 posted on 08/26/2015 10:44:29 AM PDT by Slyfox (If I'm ever accused of being a Christian, I'd like there to be enough evidence to convict me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson