So, losing a case in court means, "following the letter of the law." I think not. Trump tried to commit a crime, but because of the spunk of a lady, and his business failures he couldn't complete the crime. But he did make her like a living hell for decades. BY saying "he followed the letter of the law" are you giving him credit for not sending men with Uzis to kill her or kidnap her?
What does it say about you that you are okay when shady developers and government officials get together to try to steal property?
And Trump didn't learn anything. He supported the Kelo decision. So a Trump presidency would mean eminent domain without president.
So, losing a case in court means, "following the letter of the law." I think not. Trump tried to commit a crime, but because of the spunk of a lady, and his business failures he couldn't complete the crime. But he did make her like a living hell for decades. BY saying "he followed the letter of the law" are you giving him credit for not sending men with Uzis to kill her or kidnap her? No. What I am saying and doing is trying to correct those who claim he stole her property and threw her out on the street.
As with all things, truth matters. That is what I am arguing. It has nothing to do with whether I want Trump for President, even though you may think so.