The rankings aren’t surprising. But because the article neither links back to the original source nor explains the methodology, it’s not entirely persuasive.
For example, no matter how bad things are in Indianola, maybe it’s not nearly so bad there as it is in Camden NJ or E. St. Louis IL.
Moreover, although Indianola and Jackson look a lot worse on this list than do Moss Point and McComb, what are the percentage differences? And are they statistically significant?
Last but not least, if the article had been well done, I think it would have told us which cities and counties in MS have the SAFEST environments? Maybe that’s where I wanna be!
I post you critique they decide. :>)