“You’re going on and on about ‘starving kids’ while ‘someone has abundance (by the way, how much do you make while there are ‘starving kids’ around the globe?”
No that was not my point at all. Nor did I go on and on.
“The issue isn’t whether or not someone is a king, the issue you are bringing up is just how much someone should make, whiel there are ‘starving kids’ In the world, before they become ‘unGodly’ apparently”
Well, no. That wasn’t something I said either.
“Franklin Graham has massive responsibilities in his duties in SP- He is I n constant demand, his time is not his own- and he has sacrificed his life and desires to serve God, and you can bet that a good portion of that money goes to meeting his needs financially while on the road and traveling the world spreading the gospel-”
Again, we don’t know how he spends his personal money. Let’s give him the benefit of the doubt that he is a good steward. This isn’t the point.
“You and I would shrink like wilted flowers under the pressures He has to endure- yet you sit there and criticize him for earning a living? Really?”
You post about everything except the simple point that I stated concerned me.
Best
[[Well, no. That wasn’t something I said either.]]
Sorry- I had you mixed up with ‘above my paygrade’- I was answering you both at same time
[[You post about everything except the simple point that I stated concerned me.]]
Because I posted the wrong response to you- it was meant for ‘above my paygrade’- I had two windows of replies open at the same time- disregard my comments to you- sorry for the confusion