Why on earth would we be discussing a state court case as regards Federal citizenship? Apart from that, the Legislature of New York overturned that verdict by passing new law which rendered that decision moot.
Lynch v Clarke is an interesting footnote in history, but it has no bearing on the salient point. The US Federal citizenship did not utilize English Common law. How could it? By English common law, rejecting your status as a subject of the king was strictly forbidden.
It does possess salience.
The point is, and continuing what I was saying yesterday - people born on U.S. soil cannot have their citizenship somehow revoked, even if they were born 1 week ago or 30 years ago or before 1844.
Some were arguing that children born to illegal aliens even recently were never citizens to begin with, and that is false.