To: SeekAndFind
But Colorado-based Western Union contended a state attorney general didn’t have the authority to review wire transfers from other U.S. states directly to Mexico, arguing that it violated the privacy of their customers and overstepped limits on the state’s search-and-seizure authority.
And there we have it. This is asset forfeiture. Pure and Simple. Funny how the libertarians who moan and groan at this practice are apparently fine when Trump proposes it.
14 posted on
08/20/2015 7:26:33 AM PDT by
Responsibility2nd
(With Great Freedom comes Great Responsibility)
To: Responsibility2nd
And there we have it. This is asset forfeiture. Pure and Simple. Funny how the libertarians who moan and groan at this practice are apparently fine when Trump proposes it.
Did you forget the subject here is...I-L-L-E-G-A-L-S...?
To: Responsibility2nd
I have no problem with the government seizing the assets of criminal illegal invaders.
39 posted on
08/20/2015 7:51:57 AM PDT by
TexasFreeper2009
(You can't spell Hillary without using the letters L, I, A, & R)
To: Responsibility2nd
And there we have it. This is asset forfeiture. Pure and Simple. Funny how the libertarians who moan and groan at this practice are apparently fine when Trump proposes it. I see your point, on the other hand I consider it asset forfeiture of legal American taxpayers when the illegals siphon off our tax dollars and transfer them to southern border countries instead of infusing them back into the American economy. And those American dollars are of the major concern to those foreign governments, not the plight of their citizens.
54 posted on
08/20/2015 8:40:54 AM PDT by
Mastador1
(I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson