Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton Comms Dir Doesn’t Think Questions About Wiping Hillary’s Server Are ‘Legitimate’ [VIDEO]
The Daily Caller ^ | 08/19/2015 | Steve Guest

Posted on 08/19/2015 11:19:49 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

Communications director Jen Palmieri said Wednesday that her candidate Hillary Clinton is “nearing the end of legitimate questions for her to answer” about the private email server she used as secretary of state.

Appearing on MSNBC’s “Andrea Mitchell Reports” on Wednesday, Palmieri stated that questions about Clinton’s proper handling of classified information do not affect voters’ lives.

Palmieri indicated that voters in New Hampshire and Iowa have never asked Hillary about the server saying, “People are asking her questions that affect their lives.”

Luke Russert: I’ve got to ask you, a lot of Democrats are privately saying that press conference did not go well. Are you guys prepared to deal with this email issue for the next 6 to 15 months? It doesn’t seem to be going away.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: clinton
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: Jim 0216

We need more men and fewer “guys.”


21 posted on 08/19/2015 12:19:49 PM PDT by Mercat (The angel of the LORD encamps around those who fear him and delivers them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Even if you accepted the premise of what this political hack says about nearing the end of “legitimate” questions about Hillary’s server (which I don’t) we haven’t heard any truthful or straightforward answers from Hillary. So, until we do get truthful answers (which Hillary is incapable of) all questions are and continue to be legitimate.


22 posted on 08/19/2015 12:36:36 PM PDT by falcon99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: falcon99

“Appearing on MSNBC’s “Andrea Mitchell Reports” on Wednesday, Palmieri stated that questions about Clinton’s proper handling of classified information do not affect voters’ lives.”

I would ask those four heroes at Benghazi that question... no wait, we can’t because Hillary mishandled classified information, lied about it and let 4 people die because of it.


23 posted on 08/19/2015 12:39:28 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz ("Hillary, you magnificent b**ch! I read your book!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Communications director Jen Palmieri said Wednesday that her candidate Hillary Clinton is “nearing the end of legitimate questions for her to answer”

The FBI might beg to differ with that.

24 posted on 08/19/2015 12:48:10 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim 0216

Perfect comparison, there!

I think Palmieri will soon learn that the press is mad already and poking at them with inflated arrogance to say that the campaign and Hillary will not be answering any
“illegitimate” inquiry is BEGGING for press trouble— trouble they don’t need. Obviously.


25 posted on 08/19/2015 1:15:45 PM PDT by RitaOK ( VIVA CRISTO REY / Public education is the farm team for more Marxists coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

They are once again throwing a rope around reporters.


26 posted on 08/19/2015 1:32:56 PM PDT by outofsalt ( If history teaches us anything it's that history rarely teaches us anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

Thanks Grampa Dave,

Walking out my office now with a grand chuckle
with the cartoon you posted.


27 posted on 08/19/2015 1:41:05 PM PDT by bayoublazer (Conservative, by reasons of higher cognitive skills!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Her Royal Highness Hillary Of Liesley might be able to dictate to the New York Times what's ‘news’ and ‘what's not’... but some in the MSM aren't corrupt fools.

That said, I believe the server was wiped clean and any fragments the FBI finds will have been put there intentionally. The FBI should have seized the server as soon as they suspected there was classified material on an unsecure server.

It's too late now to do it right....

Without absolute proof Hillary's criminal and gullible followers will continue to back her.

28 posted on 08/19/2015 2:39:13 PM PDT by GOPJ (School-to-prison pipeline means gentle giants can choke and beat all the teachers they want.Greenfie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

staged events have so much credibility!


29 posted on 08/19/2015 3:14:19 PM PDT by wiggen (#JeSuisCharlie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

She looks good in orange. See Drudge at the moment.


30 posted on 08/19/2015 3:32:23 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew (Even the compassion of the wicked is cruel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

Wiping the drive was itself a criminal act.

18 U. S. C. §1519 states: “Whoever knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals, covers up, falsifies, or makes a false entry in any record, document, or tangible object with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States or any case filed under title 11, or in relation to or contemplation of any such matter or case, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.”


31 posted on 08/19/2015 3:50:25 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (To defeat the democRATs, we must first defeat the Republicans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
18 U. S. C. §1519 states: “Whoever knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals, covers up, falsifies, or makes a false entry in any record, document, or tangible object with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States or any case filed under title 11, or in relation to or contemplation of any such matter or case, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.”

The Clintons would have a field day making fun of that law if it was the only thing we had against them... Look, they wiped it clean... the FBI was too late and played for fools... It happens.

32 posted on 08/20/2015 8:51:52 AM PDT by GOPJ (The term "New York Times' is offensive to me - it's microaggression aimed at traditional Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson