The son shall not suffer for the mother stealing a bank account. Lines up with Ezekiel 18:20.
So if the country decides immigration policy, that would only be for here right now going forwards, and not a retroactive policy.
And thus, one could not strip anyone of their citizenship even if their mother came here illegally. And how could one even find out what her intent was if the goal is to deny an “anchor baby” of citizenship? Regardless, her child could not be deported.
If she got pregnant after she came to the U.S. illegally and then had the child in the U.S., her child would undoubtedly be an American citizen. Would you deport that child? How would you find out it was her goal to have an anchor baby?
“How would you find out it was her goal to have an anchor baby?”
Are you actually serious with this nonsense? The mother’s intention, as I just said, has no bearing whatsoever on the citizenship status of her offspring.
The bank account scenario I mention was limited to your saying that time makes illegalities legal. Even with your money?
Again you maintain: “How would you find out it was her goal to have an anchor baby? Would you deport the child?”
Yes, unless the father was American. I would not even inquire what her goal was. How could I find out what intentions she has locked away in her mind?
Allowing her to stay here with her baby would be rewarding her for illegal behavior. It would be up to her and the FATHER of the baby to take care of the situation back where they came from. Why should the taxpayers provide for her offspring, while the father is foot loose and fancy free. If you want to do so privately, that is your option. Have at it. You are bound to already be doing that, otherwise you are a bit hypocritical — wanting taxpayers to do something that enables you to take the moral high ground and sit in judgment on everyone else.
“Ezekiel 18:20”
The citizenship requirements in the Old Testament were much more restrictive than anything you have ever encountered, as I mentioned and you ignored.