Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: trebb

the founders wanted to insure no split loyalties, at least by birth.
they also wanted to make sure no foreign king could ever become POTUS.

these were the motivations behind using the phrase ‘natural born citizen’

understanding that, please explain how the phrase insures it. what does it exclude?


6 posted on 08/18/2015 3:49:28 AM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: sten
the founders wanted to insure no split loyalties, at least by birth. they also wanted to make sure no foreign king could ever become POTUS. these were the motivations behind using the phrase ‘natural born citizen’ understanding that, please explain how the phrase insures it. what does it exclude?

You can look up all the definitions as easily as I. I would rather that you just say whatever it is you are trying to say - without data to the contrary, I must assume you think that my comment about "none of them are ineligible except for probably Obama" was wrong. Give me something to work with and I'll be glad to have a conversation.

7 posted on 08/18/2015 3:56:27 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson