Hillary Clinton's Email Company: No Evidence That Her Server Had A Backup

Breitbart.com ^ | 8-17-2015 | Patrick Howley

[Eroteme]

Some interesting new pieces of info here.

[dontreadthis]

this in itself is likely illegal

[Cats Pajamas]

Can you elaborate?

[happyathome]

Didn’t this company just come out a few days ago saying there was “probably a backup somewhere”??? I’m guessing that was a signal to the Clinton Crime Family Foundation, and a suitable payoff was made allowing them to now claim there never was a backup.

[jtal]

How convenient. Those boys must have had their palms greased by the Clinton slush fund, err foundation.

[PghBaldy]

Report earlier today was there MIGHT have been a backup... Not sure what is true. I wonder what will happen when Congress gets back from their not-needed vacation? I assume they will screw it all up.

[doc1019]

And what data company doesn’t back-up and back-up again and do a back-up. I say BS. If what they say is true, who would want to use them for there server services?

[tumblindice]

Bonehead will appoint another special investigator who will do absolutely nothing.

[VerySadAmerican]

Some Platt River people must have found their cats dead on their front steps.

As many people that work for the state department you’d think there’d be one honest person there who would become a “deep throat” and spill the beans.

[struggle]

Say what you want, but the internet is forever.

[Vendome]

[faithhopecharity]

I rather think there was a backup, as pretty normal procedure in data world these days (especially for a professional firm)

so I am suspicious of this new claim

we will see...

[kevao]

no backup of Clinton’s server has ever been known to exist.

More parsing. Tells me a backup server is out there. They know it. And they're parsing in case it is discovered. (Oh? Well when we said that, we didn't know....")

[Bon mots]

[dontreadthis]

[PghBaldy]

We might be better if if Congress doesn’t come back...

[Osage Orange]

Hillary will...be cleared of all..and anything.

Come on..FReeper's...who here thinks she will be charged with anything?

[Nep Nep]

If it’s just a co-located server, the hosting company would have no responsibility or access to do backups, they’re just there to provide network connectivity, UPS, physical security, and to swap failed RAID drives or do other hardware maintenance as requested by the client.

The real question here is that if the drives were blank, what exactly was being hosted there? There’s no reason to co-locate a server with blank drives, it wouldn’t do anything.

[doc1019]

Thanks for the education. Makes a little more sense now. AND more questions.

[jonascord]

And what company deals with the Clintons and doesn't know they can wind up in the trunk of their own car, stabbed, beaten, with liver cancer, strangled, poisoned, irradiated, struck be lightning, throwm from a 10th floor balcony, hit by a car, with the back of their heads blown off and a verdict of "Death by the visitation of God..."?

Silence is it's own reward.