Let’s review, shall we?
There were 139 posts on this thread before my first post. If you go back and read the first fifty or so posts, many of them are attacks on birthers or ridicule of birthers.
For example, post #1 says simply: “Birther please;” a modern-day colloquialism for “please stop this nonsense.”
My first post is in response to the following post (#54) from “CA Guy:”
“But somehow all court challenges felt the president was there legally.
So someone presented something in favor of the president’s position that may be the case against the opposition or the opposition couldn’t make a case, right? Who won a case against the president regarding status, did I miss something?”
I responded to CA Guy’s post by factually listing the lawsuits against Secretaries of State for putting Obama on the ballot and the eligibility challenges that were heard by state Election boards.
I concluded my post by answering his question concerning whether anybody had won a case by saying: “Obama being eligible prevailed in every legal action mentioned above.”
At that point, you got your birtherbot panties all in a twist. And all I had posted was facts.
No doubt you had an excellent excuse for at least half of the hundreds—more likely thousands—of times you’ve harped on this issue. The only difference yesterday is that you were more honest about why you obsessive-compulsively post those stats.